383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11442184)
21. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer.
Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Pourjavan S
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The role of central corneal thickness in the diagnosis of glaucoma.
Thomas R; Korah S; Muliyil J
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Jun; 48(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 11116505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Central corneal thickness in low-tension glaucoma.
Emara BY; Tingey DP; Probst LE; Motolko MA
Can J Ophthalmol; 1999 Oct; 34(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 10604052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of a novel Scheimpflug-based non-contact tonometer in healthy subjects and patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Reznicek L; Muth D; Kampik A; Neubauer AS; Hirneiss C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 97(11):1410-4. PubMed ID: 23969314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J
Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma and comparison with open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes.
Grise-Dulac A; Saad A; Abitbol O; Febbraro JL; Azan E; Moulin-Tyrode C; Gatinel D
J Glaucoma; 2012 Sep; 21(7):486-9. PubMed ID: 21734593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Importance of central corneal thickness when studying ocular hypertensive eyes, glaucoma suspects and preperimetric glaucomatous eyes].
Alías EG; Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2007 Oct; 82(10):615-21. PubMed ID: 17929204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of central corneal thickness on dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Grieshaber MC; Schoetzau A; Zawinka C; Flammer J; Orgul S
Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 125(6):740-4. PubMed ID: 17562982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of goldmann applanation tonometer, noncontact tonometer, and TonoPen XL for intraocular pressure measurement in different types of glaucomatous, ocular hypertensive, and normal eyes.
Kim NR; Kim CY; Kim H; Seong GJ; Lee ES
Curr Eye Res; 2011 Apr; 36(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 21284505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The corneal thickness and intraocular pressure story: where are we now?
Lee GA; Khaw PT; Ficker LA; Shah P
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Oct; 30(5):334-7. PubMed ID: 12213156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [The measurement of central corneal thickness of normal subjects and glaucomatous patients with optical coherence tomography].
Liu X; Zeng YF; Huang JJ; Zheng XP; Ling YL; Cai XY
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 42(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 16643748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Fernandez-Vidal A; Mendez-Hernandez C; Garcia-Sanchez J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4410-4. PubMed ID: 17003433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Central corneal thickness on GAT (Goldman applanation tonometry accuracy).
Stodtmeister R
J Glaucoma; 2002 Dec; 11(6):543. PubMed ID: 12483103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The relationship between measurement method and corneal structure on apparent intraocular pressure in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Nessim M; Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Apr; 36(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 23253796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Central corneal thickness in normal, glaucomatous, and ocular hypertensive eyes.
Herndon LW; Choudhri SA; Cox T; Damji KF; Shields MB; Allingham RR
Arch Ophthalmol; 1997 Sep; 115(9):1137-41. PubMed ID: 9298054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Intraocular pressure and corneal thickness. A comparison between non-contact tonometry and applanation tonometry].
Domke N; Hager A; Wiegand W
Ophthalmologe; 2006 Jul; 103(7):583-7. PubMed ID: 16786183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Corneal viscoelastic differences between pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma.
Ozkok A; Tamcelik N; Ozdamar A; Sarici AM; Cicik E
J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):740-5. PubMed ID: 24299728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and noncontact tonometry in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Erdurmus M; Totan Y; Hepsen IF; Yagci R
Eye (Lond); 2009 Mar; 23(3):663-8. PubMed ID: 18259205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.
Barleon L; Hoffmann EM; Berres M; Pfeiffer N; Grus FH
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 142(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 17011849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
