These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Single appointment crown and bridge. An innovative technique. Bender AJ Dent Today; 2002 May; 21(5):84-7. PubMed ID: 12026726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An analysis of direct versus indirect provisionalization. Le TM Dent Today; 2006 Oct; 25(10):136, 138-41; quiz 141, 147. PubMed ID: 17058404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. Syrek A; Reich G; Ranftl D; Klein C; Cerny B; Brodesser J J Dent; 2010 Jul; 38(7):553-9. PubMed ID: 20381576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of matrix type on surface roughness of three resins for provisional crowns and fixed partial dentures. Ayuso-Montero R; Martinez-Gomis J; Lujan-Climent M; Salsench J; Peraire M J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 19054307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A combined direct dowel and indirect core technique. Mekayarajjananonth T; Kiat-amnuay S; Salinas TJ Quintessence Int; 2000 Jan; 31(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 11203901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes. Abrams SH Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical application of a fiber-reinforced post system. Krasteva K J Endod; 2001 Feb; 27(2):132-3. PubMed ID: 11491639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure. Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rationale for the utilization of bonded nonmetal onlays as an alternative to PFM crowns. Ruiz JL; Christensen GJ Dent Today; 2006 Sep; 25(9):80, 82-3; quiz 83. PubMed ID: 16999165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceromer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns: effect of variations in preparation design. Cho L; Song H; Koak J; Heo S J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 12447215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations. Ayad MF J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Indirect fabrication of multiple post-and-core patterns with a vinyl polysiloxane matrix. Sabbak SA J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):555-7. PubMed ID: 12474010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Precision of fit of two margin designs for metal-ceramic crowns. Limkangwalmongkol P; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 17451481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-supported restoration. Grossmann Y; Pasciuta M; Finger IM J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 16543025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]