These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11444782)
1. Prospective comparison of the startle test (recoil) and non-stress test. Gabert HA; Miller JM J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun; 10(3):159-61. PubMed ID: 11444782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The startle test revisited. Miller JM; Rodriguez A; Gabert HA J Perinatol; 2004 Jul; 24(7):421-2. PubMed ID: 15152272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maternal position during non-stress test and fetal heart rate patterns. Cito G; Luisi S; Mezzesimi A; Cavicchioli C; Calonaci G; Petraglia F Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):335-8. PubMed ID: 15762962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does Doppler-detected fetal movement decrease the incidence of nonreactive nonstress tests? Stanco LM; Rabello Y; Medearis AL; Paul RH Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 82(6):999-1003. PubMed ID: 8233279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive value of antepartum fetal heart rate non-stress test in high-risk pregnancy. Lenstrup C; Haase N Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1985; 64(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 3984690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coupling of fetal movement and fetal heart rate accelerations as an indicator of fetal health. Baser I; Johnson TR; Paine LL Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 80(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 1603499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical study on detecting false non-reactive of non-stress test by improved acoustic stimulation. Xi Q; Du J; Liu X; Shao L Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 20677022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of fetal movements by Doppler actocardiogram and fetal B-mode imaging. Maeda K; Tatsumura M; Utsu M Clin Perinatol; 1999 Dec; 26(4):829-51. PubMed ID: 10572724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal startle response observed under ultrasonography: a good predictor of a reassuring biophysical profile. Sarinoglu C; Dell J; Mercer BM; Sibai BM Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 88(4 Pt 1):599-602. PubMed ID: 8841226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fetal vibro-acoustic stimulation with a can--a clinical study. Hofmeyr GJ; Lawrie TA; de Jager M; da Ponte A S Afr Med J; 1998 Feb; 88(2 Suppl):199-200, 203. PubMed ID: 9542487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antepartum fetal wellbeing. Chutiwongse S; Tannirandorn Y; Sukcharoen N; Witoonpanich P; Snidvongs W; Phaosavasdi S J Med Assoc Thai; 1991 May; 74(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 1783873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the effects of acoustic stimulation and feeding mother stimulation on non-reactive non-stress test: a randomized clinical trial. Hasanpour S; Raouf S; Shamsalizadeh N; Bani S; Ghojazadeh M; Sheikhan F Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jun; 287(6):1105-10. PubMed ID: 23329342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of fetal well-being: fetal movement count versus non stress test. Wilailak S; Suthutvoravut S; Cherng-sa-ad P; Herabutya Y; Chaturachinda K Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1992 Sep; 39(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 1358700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective evaluation of the contraction stress and nonstress tests in the management of post-term pregnancy. Druzin ML; Karver ML; Wagner W; Hutson JM; Waltner A; Kogut E Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Jun; 174(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 1595028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The fetal acoustic stimulation test: a reliable and cost effective method of antepartum fetal monitoring. Batcha TM; Goonewardene IM Ceylon Med J; 2005 Dec; 50(4):156-9. PubMed ID: 16538910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]