310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11444788)
1. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of two different doses of misoprostol suppositories with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Khoury AN; Zhou QP; Gorenberg DM; Nies BM; Manley GE; Mecklenburg FE
J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun; 10(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 11444788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized trial.
Sanchez-Ramos L; Peterson DE; Delke I; Gaudier FL; Kaunitz AM
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Mar; 91(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 9491868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Neiger R; Greaves PC
Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
Nunes F; Rodrigues R; Meirinho M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 181(3):626-9. PubMed ID: 10486474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming.
Tan TC; Yan SY; Chua TM; Biswas A; Chong YS
BJOG; 2010 Sep; 117(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 20722643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Saxena P; Puri M; Bajaj M; Mishra A; Trivedi SS
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intracervical misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction.
Chang YK; Chen WH; Yu MH; Liu HS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jan; 80(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12527456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.
Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative efficacy and cost of the prostaglandin analogs dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents.
Ramsey PS; Harris DY; Ogburn PL; Heise RH; Magtibay PM; Ramin KD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 188(2):560-5. PubMed ID: 12592272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Labor induction post-term with 25 micrograms vs. 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol.
Meydanli MM; Calişkan E; Burak F; Narin MA; Atmaca R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jun; 81(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 12767565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intravaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction in Nulliparous Women: A Double-blinded, Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.
Zhang Y; Zhu HP; Fan JX; Yu H; Sun LZ; Chen L; Chang Q; Zhao NQ; Di W
Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Oct; 128(20):2736-42. PubMed ID: 26481739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening in prelabour rupture of membranes after 34 weeks of gestation.
Jha N; Sagili H; Jayalakshmi D; Lakshminarayanan S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jan; 291(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25055933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert.
Maggi C; Mazzoni G; Gerosa V; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Lojacono A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Oct; 98(10):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 31140585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone.
Ozgür K; Kizilates A; Uner M; Erman O; Trak B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1997; 261(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 9451517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening/labor induction.
Ramsey PS; Ogburn PL; Harris DY; Heise RH; Ramin KD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct; 187(4):843-6. PubMed ID: 12388961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low-dose vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor beyond 41st week: A randomized trial.
De Bonrostro Torralba C; Tejero Cabrejas EL; Envid Lázaro BM; Franco Royo MJ; Roca Arquillué M; Campillos Maza JM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jul; 98(7):913-919. PubMed ID: 30723912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
