BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11444792)

  • 1. A comparison of four techniques for measuring central adiposity in postpartum adolescents.
    Stevens-Simon C; Thureen P; Stamm E; Scherzinger A
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun; 10(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11444792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skinfold caliper and ultrasound assessments of change in the distribution of subcutaneous fat during adolescent pregnancy.
    Stevens-Simon C; Thureen P; Barrett J; Stamm E
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1340-5. PubMed ID: 11571597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of subcutaneous fat measurement: comparison of skinfold calipers, ultrasound, and computed tomography.
    Orphanidou C; McCargar L; Birmingham CL; Mathieson J; Goldner E
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1994 Aug; 94(8):855-8. PubMed ID: 8046177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sonographic measurement of mesenteric fat thickness is a good correlate with cardiovascular risk factors: comparison with subcutaneous and preperitoneal fat thickness, magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometric indexes.
    Liu KH; Chan YL; Chan WB; Kong WL; Kong MO; Chan JC
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2003 Oct; 27(10):1267-73. PubMed ID: 14513076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of B-mode ultrasonic measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue and intra-abdominal depth: comparisons with skinfold thicknesses.
    Bellisari A; Roche AF; Siervogel RM
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1993 Aug; 17(8):475-80. PubMed ID: 8401751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of ultrasound and skinfold caliper measurement of subcutaneous fat tissue.
    Weits T; van der Beek EJ; Wedel M
    Int J Obes; 1986; 10(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 3531051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Is echography an adequate method for assessing the thickness of intra-abdominal fat? A comparison with computed tomography].
    Cucchi E; Piatti PM; Orena C; Pontiroli AE; Martino E; Paesano PL; Pozza G; Del Maschio A
    Radiol Med; 1997 Oct; 94(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 9465239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of subcutaneous adipose tissue using ultrasound images.
    Ramirez ME
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1992 Nov; 89(3):347-57. PubMed ID: 1485642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring abdominal adiposity in 6 to 7-year-old children.
    Liem ET; De Lucia Rolfe E; L'Abée C; Sauer PJ; Ong KK; Stolk RP
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2009 Jul; 63(7):835-41. PubMed ID: 19127281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of ultrasound and skinfold measurements in assessment of subcutaneous and total fatness.
    Borkan GA; Hults DE; Cardarelli J; Burrows BA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1982 Jul; 58(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 7124924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasonography and anthropometry for measuring regional body fat in HIV-infected patients.
    Padilla S; Gallego JA; Masiá M; Ardoy F; Hernández I; Gutiérrez F
    Curr HIV Res; 2007 Sep; 5(5):459-66. PubMed ID: 17896965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasonic and skinfold caliper measures of subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness in elderly men and women.
    Chumlea WC; Roche AF
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1986 Nov; 71(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 3544855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Body composition in sport: a comparison of a novel ultrasound imaging technique to measure subcutaneous fat tissue compared with skinfold measurement.
    Müller W; Horn M; Fürhapter-Rieger A; Kainz P; Kröpfl JM; Maughan RJ; Ahammer H
    Br J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 47(16):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24055780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of subcutaneous fat thickness with high frequency pulsed ultrasound: comparisons with a caliper and a radiographic technique.
    Black D; Vora J; Hayward M; Marks R
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1988 Feb; 9(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 3282753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of skinfold calipers as a tool for measuring body fat in human beings.
    Walia BN; Bhalla AK; Suri S
    Indian J Med Res; 1992 Aug; 96():255-7. PubMed ID: 1428065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of ultrasonographic and anthropometric methods to assess body fat in childhood obesity.
    Semiz S; Ozgören E; Sabir N
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2007 Jan; 31(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 16788571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of regional body fat distribution: comparison between W/H ratio and computed tomography in obese women.
    Zamboni M; Armellini F; Milani MP; Todesco T; De Marchi M; Robbi R; Montresor G; Bergamo AI; Bosello O
    J Intern Med; 1992 Oct; 232(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 1402638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fitness, fatness, and the effect of training assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and skinfold-thickness measurements in healthy adolescent females.
    Eliakim A; Burke GS; Cooper DM
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1997 Aug; 66(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 9250098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cadaver studies and their impact on the understanding of human adiposity.
    Clarys JP; Provyn S; Marfell-Jones MJ
    Ergonomics; 2005 Sep 15-Nov 15; 48(11-14):1445-61. PubMed ID: 16338712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Correlation between skinfold thickness and ultrasonography in the study of subcutaneous adipose tissue in females].
    Cataldo MG; Brancato D; Brancato G; Verga S; Buscemi S; Licata G
    Ann Ital Med Int; 1997; 12(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 9409947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.