These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11445087)
41. Temporal and spatial refugia modify predation risk for non-native crabs in rocky intertidal habitats. Montanaro RC; O'Connor NJ PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16852. PubMed ID: 38317840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. You Are What you Eat: a Metabolomics Approach to Understanding Prey Responses to Diet-Dependent Chemical Cues Released by Predators. Weissburg M; Poulin RX; Kubanek J J Chem Ecol; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1037-1046. PubMed ID: 27683309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Changes in the selection differential exerted on a marine snail during the ontogeny of a predatory shore crab. Pakes D; Boulding EG J Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 23(8):1613-22. PubMed ID: 20524948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Functional responses of a cosmopolitan invader demonstrate intraspecific variability in consumer-resource dynamics. Howard BR; Barrios-O'Neill D; Alexander ME; Dick JTA; Therriault TW; Robinson TB; Côté IM PeerJ; 2018; 6():e5634. PubMed ID: 30280022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Temperature adaptation in two bivalve species from different thermal habitats: energetics and remodelling of membrane lipids. Pernet F; Tremblay R; Comeau L; Guderley H J Exp Biol; 2007 Sep; 210(Pt 17):2999-3014. PubMed ID: 17704075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Quantifying the Effects of Predator and Prey Body Size on Sea Star Feeding Behaviors. Gooding RA; Harley CD Biol Bull; 2015 Jun; 228(3):192-200. PubMed ID: 26124446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Attraction of predatorily naive postlarval lobsters to extracts of metabolites of common prey:Mytilus edulis, Mya arenaria, Cancer irroratus, andAsterias vulgaris. Daniel PC; Bayer RC J Chem Ecol; 1987 May; 13(5):1201-15. PubMed ID: 24302143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Turbidity interferes with foraging success of visual but not chemosensory predators. Lunt J; Smee DL PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1212. PubMed ID: 26401444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Three-dimensional interstitial space mediates predator foraging success in different spatial arrangements. Hesterberg SG; Duckett CC; Salewski EA; Bell SS Ecology; 2017 Apr; 98(4):1153-1162. PubMed ID: 28144935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. 'Take-away' foraging spatially uncouples predator and prey-attack distributions. Smallegange IM; van der Meer J; Sabelis MW J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jul; 79(4):769-76. PubMed ID: 20443987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Recruitment of the parasitic pea crab Nepinnotheres novaezelandiae into green-lipped mussels Perna canaliculus. Trottier O; Jeffs AG Dis Aquat Organ; 2015 Jan; 112(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 25590770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Discriminating Eaters: Sea Stars Asterias rubens L. Feed Preferably on Mytilus trossulus Gould in Mixed Stocks of Mytilus trossulus and Mytilus edulis L. Khaitov V; Makarycheva A; Gantsevich M; Lentsman N; Skazina M; Gagarina A; Katolikova M; Strelkov P Biol Bull; 2018 Apr; 234(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 29856669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Partitioning mechanisms of predator interference in different habitats. Griffen BD; Byers JE Oecologia; 2006 Jan; 146(4):608-14. PubMed ID: 16086166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Anti-predatory responses of the thick shell mussel Mytilus coruscus exposed to seawater acidification and hypoxia. Sui Y; Hu M; Huang X; Wang Y; Lu W Mar Environ Res; 2015 Aug; 109():159-67. PubMed ID: 26210406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]