These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11445209)

  • 1. Suitability of a shear punch test for dental restorative materials.
    Nomoto R; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2001 Sep; 17(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 11445209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.
    Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials.
    Almuammar MF; Schulman A; Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 12049082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of long term water immersion on shear bond strength of amalgam repaired by resin composite and mediated by adhesives or resin modified glass ionomers.
    Pilo R; Nissan J; Shafir H; Shapira G; Alter E; Brosh T
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40(7):594-602. PubMed ID: 22504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.
    Millett DT; Cummings A; Letters S; Roger E; Love J
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 14700267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of fluorosis on shear bond strength of glass ionomer-based restorative materials to dentin.
    Awliya WY; Akpata ES
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 10050116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of airborne-particle abrasion on the shear bond strength of four restorative materials to enamel and dentin.
    Mujdeci A; Gokay O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 15343159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shear punch strength and flexural strength of model composites with varying filler volume fraction, particle size and silanation.
    Ikejima I; Nomoto R; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2003 May; 19(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 12628432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials.
    Piwowarczyk A; Lauer HC; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 15343162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The strength of auto-cured and light-cured materials. The shear punch test.
    Mount GJ; Makinson OF; Peters MC
    Aust Dent J; 1996 Apr; 41(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 8670032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH.
    Shabanian M; Richards LC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 12131888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of shear bond strength of silorane resin to conventional, resin-modified glass ionomers and nano-ionomer cements.
    Babannavar R; Shenoy A
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 23355365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of three bleaching agents on the surface properties of three different esthetic restorative materials.
    Turker SB; Biskin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):466-73. PubMed ID: 12806324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of early water exposure on the strength of glass ionomer restoratives.
    Wang XY; Yap AU; Ngo HC
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 17024947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture toughness of various core build-up materials.
    Bonilla ED; Mardirossian G; Caputo AA
    J Prosthodont; 2000 Mar; 9(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 11074023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the effect of storage media on hardness and shear punch strength of tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Bagheri R; Tyas MJ; Burrow MF
    Am J Dent; 2007 Oct; 20(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 17993032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro shear bond strength of three self-adhesive resin cements and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement to various prosthodontic substrates.
    Sabatini C; Patel M; D'Silva E
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):186-96. PubMed ID: 22913244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.