These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11445209)

  • 21. In vitro shear bond strength of resin-based luting cements to dentin.
    Santos MJ; Driessen CH; de Freitas AP; Rizkalla AS; Santos GC
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(4):e215-20. PubMed ID: 22782054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of shear bond strength of composite, compomer and resin modified glass ionomer in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.
    Prabhakar AR; Raj S; Raju OS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Sep; 21(3):86-94. PubMed ID: 14703213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Immediate and delayed shear bond strength evaluation between root canal sealers and restorative materials: an experimental study.
    Alghazaly A; Mirah M; Saleh S
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Oct; 24(1):1217. PubMed ID: 39402532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Laboratory strength of glass ionomer cement, compomers, and resin composites.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Lauer HC; Büchler A
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12087545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Flexure strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cements and their bond strength to dental composites.
    Li J; Liu Y; Liu Y; Söremark R; Sundström F
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1996 Feb; 54(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 8669242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dental resin composites containing ceramic whiskers and precured glass ionomer particles.
    Xu HH; Eichmiller FC; Antonucci JM; Schumacher GE; Ives LK
    Dent Mater; 2000 Sep; 16(5):356-63. PubMed ID: 10915897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fracture toughness of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials: effect of powder/liquid ratio and powder particle size reduction on fracture toughness.
    Mitsuhashi A; Hanaoka K; Teranaka T
    Dent Mater; 2003 Dec; 19(8):747-57. PubMed ID: 14511733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A study of the fracture resistance of nyyar cores of three restorative materials.
    Ferrier S; Sekhon BS; Brunton PA
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 18505221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of thermocycling on the bond strength of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement: an in vitro comparative study.
    Arici S; Arici N
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):692-6. PubMed ID: 14719734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber reinforced posts and cast gold post and cores cemented with three cements.
    Torres-Sánchez C; Montoya-Salazar V; Córdoba P; Vélez C; Guzmán-Duran A; Gutierrez-Pérez JL; Torres-Lagares D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23929374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Gradual surface degradation of restorative materials by acidic agents.
    Hengtrakool C; Kukiattrakoon B; Kedjarune-Leggat U
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(2):e50-62. PubMed ID: 21903509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements to teeth.
    Terata R; Nakashima K; Kubota M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 11763933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of the flexural strength of six reinforced restorative materials.
    Cohen BI; Volovich Y; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 12017792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate on bond strength of a glass-fibre post luted with resin or glass-ionomer based cement.
    de Araújo DF; Chaves LP; Bim O; Pimentel Garcia FC; Ishikiriama SK; Honório HM; Wang L
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 24613604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Failure behavior of glass ionomer cement under Hertzian indentation.
    Wang Y; Darvell BW
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1223-9. PubMed ID: 18359073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimizing preparation design for metal-free composite resin crowns.
    Ohlmann B; Gruber R; Eickemeyer G; Rammelsberg P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 18762033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.