These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11445885)

  • 1. Abortion without free and informed consent? An Austrian case of first impression.
    Bernat E
    J Med Philos; 2001 Jun; 26(3):311-21. PubMed ID: 11445885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
    Goldman EB
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Potential constitutional issues raised by the proposed amendments to the Georgia abortion statute.
    Berg RN
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Feb; 71(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 7077199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Teenage abortion in Germany: with reference to the legal system in the United States.
    Belling DW; Eberl C
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):475-502. PubMed ID: 8666732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regulating abortion services.
    Riggs VP
    N Engl J Med; 1980 Feb; 302(6):350. PubMed ID: 7350908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Woman's Choice-East Side Women's Clinic v. Newman.
    Indiana. Supreme Court
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1996 Aug; 671():104-13. PubMed ID: 12041239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed, again.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Oct; 16(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 3771197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Stringent responsibilities of the physician in pregnancy termination. The decision of the 28 May 1993 federal court mandates new guidelines].
    Faller HJ
    Versicherungsmedizin; 1994 Apr; 46(2):35-7. PubMed ID: 8197661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right?
    Barber RA
    Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A proposed statute for implementing the abortion decisions.
    Sykes JM
    J Fam Law; 1973; 13(2):332-65. PubMed ID: 11661022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of medical technology on the pregnant woman's right to privacy.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2-3):213-32. PubMed ID: 3333216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Report of Anne C. Speckhard, Ph.D.
    Speckhard AC
    Issues Law Med; 1999; 14(4):453-63. PubMed ID: 10232004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medicine and the law: treatment of minors--consent requirements.
    Young MG
    Tex Med; 1983 Jan; 79(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 6687501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rust v Sullivan: legal issues and ethical concerns.
    Spielman B
    Womens Health Issues; 1991; 1(4):172-6. PubMed ID: 1822812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assisted and surrogate decision making for pregnant patients who have schizophrenia.
    Coverdale JH; McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
    Schizophr Bull; 2004; 30(3):659-64. PubMed ID: 15631258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informed consent and 'wrongful birth': the Austrian Supreme Court's approach.
    Bernat E
    Med Law; 1992; 11(1-2):67-72. PubMed ID: 1522780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In re A.C.
    District of Columbia. Court of Appeals, en banc
    Atl Report; 1990 Apr; 573():1235-64. PubMed ID: 11648191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Judgment, 20 March 1986.
    Italy. Corte Magistrale Genova
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():38. PubMed ID: 12346713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1986 Jun; 106():2169-216. PubMed ID: 12041287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.