329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11447091)
1. Optical mapping of ventricular defibrillation in isolated swine right ventricles: demonstration of a postshock isoelectric window after near-threshold defibrillation shocks.
Wang NC; Lee MH; Ohara T; Okuyama Y; Fishbein GA; Lin SF; Karagueuzian HS; Chen PS
Circulation; 2001 Jul; 104(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 11447091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Activation during ventricular defibrillation in open-chest dogs. Evidence of complete cessation and regeneration of ventricular fibrillation after unsuccessful shocks.
Chen PS; Shibata N; Dixon EG; Wolf PD; Danieley ND; Sweeney MB; Smith WM; Ideker RE
J Clin Invest; 1986 Mar; 77(3):810-23. PubMed ID: 3949979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intracellular calcium and vulnerability to fibrillation and defibrillation in Langendorff-perfused rabbit ventricles.
Hwang GS; Hayashi H; Tang L; Ogawa M; Hernandez H; Tan AY; Li H; Karagueuzian HS; Weiss JN; Lin SF; Chen PS
Circulation; 2006 Dec; 114(24):2595-603. PubMed ID: 17116770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Right ventricular insertion promotes reinitiation of ventricular fibrillation in defibrillation failure.
Iijima K; Zhang H; Strachan MT; Huang J; Walcott GP; Rogers JM
Heart Rhythm; 2021 Jun; 18(6):995-1003. PubMed ID: 33508518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of the relationship between preshock state and virtual electrode polarization-induced propagated graded responses resulting in arrhythmia induction.
Bourn DW; Gray RA; Trayanova NA
Heart Rhythm; 2006 May; 3(5):583-95. PubMed ID: 16648066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanisms of defibrillation. Critical points and the upper limit of vulnerability.
Walcott GP; Walcott KT; Ideker RE
J Electrocardiol; 1995; 28 Suppl():1-6. PubMed ID: 8656095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanism of ventricular defibrillation for near-defibrillation threshold shocks: a whole-heart optical mapping study in swine.
Chattipakorn N; Banville I; Gray RA; Ideker RE
Circulation; 2001 Sep; 104(11):1313-9. PubMed ID: 11551885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tunnel propagation following defibrillation with ICD shocks: hidden postshock activations in the left ventricular wall underlie isoelectric window.
Constantino J; Long Y; Ashihara T; Trayanova NA
Heart Rhythm; 2010 Jul; 7(7):953-61. PubMed ID: 20348028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional mapping of earliest activation after near-threshold ventricular defibrillation shocks.
Chattipakorn N; Fotuhi PC; Chattipakorn SC; Ideker RE
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 14(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12625612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of activation during ventricular fibrillation and following unsuccessful defibrillation shocks in open-chest dogs.
Chen PS; Wolf PD; Melnick SD; Danieley ND; Smith WM; Ideker RE
Circ Res; 1990 Jun; 66(6):1544-60. PubMed ID: 2344664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between "extension of refractoriness" and probability of successful defibrillation.
Tovar OH; Jones JL
Am J Physiol; 1997 Feb; 272(2 Pt 2):H1011-9. PubMed ID: 9124409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of shock strengths on ventricular defibrillation failure.
Chattipakorn N; Banville I; Gray RA; Ideker RE
Cardiovasc Res; 2004 Jan; 61(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 14732200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transmural recording of shock potential gradient fields, early postshock activations, and refibrillation episodes associated with external defibrillation of long-duration ventricular fibrillation in swine.
Allred JD; Killingsworth CR; Allison JS; Dosdall DJ; Melnick SB; Smith WM; Ideker RE; Walcott GP
Heart Rhythm; 2008 Nov; 5(11):1599-606. PubMed ID: 18984539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of lidocaine on relation between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability in open-chest dogs.
Topham SL; Cha YM; Peters BB; Chen PS
Circulation; 1992 Mar; 85(3):1146-51. PubMed ID: 1537112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
Swerdlow CD; Ahern T; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Chen PS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 27(5):1112-8. PubMed ID: 8609329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Post-shock synchronized pacing in isolated rabbit left ventricle: evaluation of a novel defibrillation strategy.
Tang L; Hwang GS; Song J; Chen PS; Lin SF
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Jul; 18(7):740-9. PubMed ID: 17388914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Mechanism of induction and termination of ventricular fibrillation--significance of dispersion of ventricular repolarization].
Behrens S; Zabel M; Franz MR; Schultheiss HP
Z Kardiol; 2000 Dec; 89(12):1098-107. PubMed ID: 11201025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of ventricular vulnerability.
Chen PS; Shibata N; Dixon EG; Martin RO; Ideker RE
Circulation; 1986 May; 73(5):1022-8. PubMed ID: 3698224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pacing following shocks stronger than the defibrillation threshold: impact on defibrillation outcome.
Chattipakorn N; Fotuhi PC; Ideker RE
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Sep; 11(9):1022-8. PubMed ID: 11021473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of defibrillation shock energy and timing on 3-D computer model of heart.
Province RA; Fishler MG; Thakor NV
Ann Biomed Eng; 1993; 21(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 8434817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
