These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11447239)

  • 41. DNA-based paternity analysis and genetic evaluation in a large, commercial cattle ranch setting.
    Van Eenennaam AL; Weaber RL; Drake DJ; Penedo MC; Quaas RL; Garrick DJ; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3159-69. PubMed ID: 17878282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effectiveness of 10 polymorphic microsatellite markers for parentage and pedigree analysis in plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae).
    Li K; Geng J; Qu J; Zhang Y; Hu S
    BMC Genet; 2010 Nov; 11():101. PubMed ID: 21062500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Pedigree reconstruction in wild cichlid fish populations.
    Koch M; Hadfield JD; Sefc KM; Sturmbauer C
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Oct; 17(20):4500-11. PubMed ID: 18986496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Eco-evolutionary dynamics: fluctuations in population growth rate reduce effective population size in chinook salmon.
    Waples RS; Jensen DW; McClure M
    Ecology; 2010 Mar; 91(3):902-14. PubMed ID: 20426347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) genome and transcriptome.
    Christensen KA; Leong JS; Sakhrani D; Biagi CA; Minkley DR; Withler RE; Rondeau EB; Koop BF; Devlin RH
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195461. PubMed ID: 29621340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. DNA fingerprinting used to test for family effects on precocious sexual maturation in two populations of Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Chinook salmon).
    Heath DD; Iwama GK; Devlin RH
    Heredity (Edinb); 1994 Dec; 73 ( Pt 6)():616-24. PubMed ID: 7814263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Pedigree reconstruction from SNP data: parentage assignment, sibship clustering and beyond.
    Huisman J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Sep; 17(5):1009-1024. PubMed ID: 28271620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Estimation of migration rates from marker-based parentage analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Jul; 23(13):3191-213. PubMed ID: 24863365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An integrated linkage map reveals candidate genes underlying adaptive variation in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha).
    McKinney GJ; Seeb LW; Larson WA; Gomez-Uchida D; Limborg MT; Brieuc MS; Everett MV; Naish KA; Waples RK; Seeb JE
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 May; 16(3):769-83. PubMed ID: 26490135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Unbiased estimation of relative reproductive success of different groups: evaluation and correction of bias caused by parentage assignment errors.
    Araki H; Blouin MS
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Nov; 14(13):4097-109. PubMed ID: 16262861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Genetic evaluation using parentage information from genetic markers.
    Dodds KG; Tate ML; Sise JA
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Oct; 83(10):2271-9. PubMed ID: 16160036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Additive and non-additive genetic components of the jack male life history in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha).
    Forest AR; Semeniuk CA; Heath DD; Pitcher TE
    Genetica; 2016 Aug; 144(4):477-85. PubMed ID: 27450674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Census vs. effective population size in chinook salmon: large- and small-scale environmental perturbation effects.
    Shrimpton JM; Heath DD
    Mol Ecol; 2003 Oct; 12(10):2571-83. PubMed ID: 12969462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A bayesian framework for parentage analysis: the value of genetic and other biological data.
    Neff BD; Repka J; Gross MR
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Jun; 59(4):315-31. PubMed ID: 11560451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Impact of candidate sire number and sire relatedness on DNA polymorphism-based measures of exclusion probability and probability of unambiguous parentage.
    Sherman GB; Kachman SD; Hungerford LL; Rupp GP; Fox CP; Brown MD; Feuz BM; Holm TR
    Anim Genet; 2004 Jun; 35(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 15147394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Red and white Chinook salmon: genetic divergence and mate choice.
    Lehnert SJ; Pitcher TE; Devlin RH; Heath DD
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Mar; 25(6):1259-74. PubMed ID: 26836978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Genetic variation, relatedness, and effective population size of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the southern Beaufort Sea, Alaska.
    Cronin MA; Amstrup SC; Talbot SL; Sage GK; Amstrup KS
    J Hered; 2009; 100(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 19633212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Differentiating salmon populations at broad and fine geographical scales with microsatellites and single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Narum SR; Banks M; Beacham TD; Bellinger MR; Campbell MR; Dekoning J; Elz A; Guthrie CM; Kozfkay C; Miller KM; Moran P; Phillips R; Seeb LW; Smith CT; Warheit K; Young SF; Garza JC
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Aug; 17(15):3464-77. PubMed ID: 19160476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Relative accuracy of three common methods of parentage analysis in natural populations.
    Harrison HB; Saenz-Agudelo P; Planes S; Jones GP; Berumen ML
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Feb; 22(4):1158-70. PubMed ID: 23278953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Male-female relatedness at specific SNP-linkage groups influences cryptic female choice in Chinook salmon (
    Geßner C; Johnson SL; Fisher P; Clarke S; Rutherford K; Symonds J; Gemmell NJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Jul; 284(1859):. PubMed ID: 28747474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.