These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11447265)

  • 1. Sexually antagonistic coevolution of a postmating-prezygotic reproductive character in desert Drosophila.
    Knowles LL; Markow TA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Jul; 98(15):8692-6. PubMed ID: 11447265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring the consequences of postmating-prezygotic interactions between the sexes.
    Knowles LL; Hernandez BB; Markow TA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Aug; 271 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S357-9. PubMed ID: 15504017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproductive Isolation through Experimental Manipulation of Sexually Antagonistic Coevolution in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Syed ZA; Chatterjee M; Samant MA; Prasad NG
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3330. PubMed ID: 28611437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Divergent evolutionary trajectories shape the postmating transcriptional profiles of conspecifically and heterospecifically mated cactophilic Drosophila females.
    Diaz F; Allan CW; Chen X; Coleman JM; Bono JM; Matzkin LM
    Commun Biol; 2022 Aug; 5(1):842. PubMed ID: 35986208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonantagonistic interactions between the sexes revealed by the ecological consequences of reproductive traits.
    Lacey Knowles L; Brodie Hernandez B; Markow TA
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jan; 18(1):156-61. PubMed ID: 15669972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative proteomics reveals rapid divergence in the postmating response of female reproductive tracts among sibling species.
    McCullough EL; McDonough CE; Pitnick S; Dorus S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Jun; 287(1929):20201030. PubMed ID: 32576111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular evolution of candidate genes involved in post-mating-prezygotic reproductive isolation.
    Bono JM; Matzkin LM; Hoang K; Brandsmeier L
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Feb; 28(2):403-14. PubMed ID: 25522894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution?
    Andrés JA; Arnqvist G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Feb; 268(1465):399-405. PubMed ID: 11270437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The genetics of postmating, prezygotic reproductive isolation between Drosophila virilis and D. americana.
    Sweigart AL
    Genetics; 2010 Feb; 184(2):401-10. PubMed ID: 19917764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ejaculate-female coevolution in Drosophila mojavensis.
    Pitnick S; Miller GT; Schneider K; Markow TA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Jul; 270(1523):1507-12. PubMed ID: 12965017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual and postmating reproductive isolation between allopatric Drosophila montana populations suggest speciation potential.
    Jennings JH; Mazzi D; Ritchie MG; Hoikkala A
    BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Mar; 11():68. PubMed ID: 21396136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid divergence of the male reproductive proteins in the Drosophila dunni group and implications for postmating incompatibilities between species.
    Hill T; Rosales-Stephens HL; Unckless RL
    G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 33599779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seminal fluid protein divergence among populations exhibiting postmating prezygotic reproductive isolation.
    Garlovsky MD; Evans C; Rosenow MA; Karr TL; Snook RR
    Mol Ecol; 2020 Nov; 29(22):4428-4441. PubMed ID: 32939895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid diversification of sperm precedence traits and processes among three sibling Drosophila species.
    Manier MK; Belote JM; Berben KS; Lüpold S; Ala-Honkola O; Collins WF; Pitnick S
    Evolution; 2013 Aug; 67(8):2348-62. PubMed ID: 23888856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strength of sexual and postmating prezygotic barriers varies between sympatric populations with different histories and species abundances.
    Poikela N; Kinnunen J; Wurdack M; Kauranen H; Schmitt T; Kankare M; Snook RR; Hoikkala A
    Evolution; 2019 Jun; 73(6):1182-1199. PubMed ID: 30957216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Postmating transcriptional changes in reproductive tracts of con- and heterospecifically mated Drosophila mojavensis females.
    Bono JM; Matzkin LM; Kelleher ES; Markow TA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7878-83. PubMed ID: 21518862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexually antagonistic coevolution between the sex chromosomes of
    Lund-Hansen KK; Olito C; Morrow EH; Abbott JK
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33602805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Divergence in replicated phylogenies: the evolution of partial post-mating prezygotic isolation in bean weevils.
    Fricke C; Arnqvist G
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Nov; 17(6):1345-54. PubMed ID: 15525419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.