213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11447265)
1. Sexually antagonistic coevolution of a postmating-prezygotic reproductive character in desert Drosophila.
Knowles LL; Markow TA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Jul; 98(15):8692-6. PubMed ID: 11447265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring the consequences of postmating-prezygotic interactions between the sexes.
Knowles LL; Hernandez BB; Markow TA
Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Aug; 271 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S357-9. PubMed ID: 15504017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproductive Isolation through Experimental Manipulation of Sexually Antagonistic Coevolution in Drosophila melanogaster.
Syed ZA; Chatterjee M; Samant MA; Prasad NG
Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3330. PubMed ID: 28611437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Divergent evolutionary trajectories shape the postmating transcriptional profiles of conspecifically and heterospecifically mated cactophilic Drosophila females.
Diaz F; Allan CW; Chen X; Coleman JM; Bono JM; Matzkin LM
Commun Biol; 2022 Aug; 5(1):842. PubMed ID: 35986208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonantagonistic interactions between the sexes revealed by the ecological consequences of reproductive traits.
Lacey Knowles L; Brodie Hernandez B; Markow TA
J Evol Biol; 2005 Jan; 18(1):156-61. PubMed ID: 15669972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative proteomics reveals rapid divergence in the postmating response of female reproductive tracts among sibling species.
McCullough EL; McDonough CE; Pitnick S; Dorus S
Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Jun; 287(1929):20201030. PubMed ID: 32576111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Molecular evolution of candidate genes involved in post-mating-prezygotic reproductive isolation.
Bono JM; Matzkin LM; Hoang K; Brandsmeier L
J Evol Biol; 2015 Feb; 28(2):403-14. PubMed ID: 25522894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution?
Andrés JA; Arnqvist G
Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Feb; 268(1465):399-405. PubMed ID: 11270437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The genetics of postmating, prezygotic reproductive isolation between Drosophila virilis and D. americana.
Sweigart AL
Genetics; 2010 Feb; 184(2):401-10. PubMed ID: 19917764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ejaculate-female coevolution in Drosophila mojavensis.
Pitnick S; Miller GT; Schneider K; Markow TA
Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Jul; 270(1523):1507-12. PubMed ID: 12965017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sexual and postmating reproductive isolation between allopatric Drosophila montana populations suggest speciation potential.
Jennings JH; Mazzi D; Ritchie MG; Hoikkala A
BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Mar; 11():68. PubMed ID: 21396136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
Fedina TY; Lewis SM
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid divergence of the male reproductive proteins in the Drosophila dunni group and implications for postmating incompatibilities between species.
Hill T; Rosales-Stephens HL; Unckless RL
G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 33599779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Seminal fluid protein divergence among populations exhibiting postmating prezygotic reproductive isolation.
Garlovsky MD; Evans C; Rosenow MA; Karr TL; Snook RR
Mol Ecol; 2020 Nov; 29(22):4428-4441. PubMed ID: 32939895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid diversification of sperm precedence traits and processes among three sibling Drosophila species.
Manier MK; Belote JM; Berben KS; Lüpold S; Ala-Honkola O; Collins WF; Pitnick S
Evolution; 2013 Aug; 67(8):2348-62. PubMed ID: 23888856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
Lorch PD; Servedio MR
Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Strength of sexual and postmating prezygotic barriers varies between sympatric populations with different histories and species abundances.
Poikela N; Kinnunen J; Wurdack M; Kauranen H; Schmitt T; Kankare M; Snook RR; Hoikkala A
Evolution; 2019 Jun; 73(6):1182-1199. PubMed ID: 30957216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Postmating transcriptional changes in reproductive tracts of con- and heterospecifically mated Drosophila mojavensis females.
Bono JM; Matzkin LM; Kelleher ES; Markow TA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7878-83. PubMed ID: 21518862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sexually antagonistic coevolution between the sex chromosomes of
Lund-Hansen KK; Olito C; Morrow EH; Abbott JK
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33602805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Divergence in replicated phylogenies: the evolution of partial post-mating prezygotic isolation in bean weevils.
Fricke C; Arnqvist G
J Evol Biol; 2004 Nov; 17(6):1345-54. PubMed ID: 15525419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
