These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1144735)

  • 1. Evaluation of new film high-light system by comparison with conventional film.
    Gray JE; Capp MP; Freundlich IM
    Radiol Technol; 1975; 47(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 1144735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Economic and organizational evaluation of an imaging network (PACS)].
    Charvet-Protat S; Thoral F
    J Radiol; 1998 Dec; 79(12):1453-9. PubMed ID: 9921447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality aspects of digital radiography in general dental practice.
    Hellén-Halme K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2007; (184):9-60. PubMed ID: 17645148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of film-screen combinations with contrast detail diagram and interactive image analysis. 2: Linear assessment of grey scale ranges with interactive image analysis].
    Stamm G; Eichbaum G; Hagemann G
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Sep; 7(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 9410005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast mapping and evaluation for electronic X-ray images on CRT display monitor.
    Suzuki J; Furukawa I; Ono S; Kitamura M; Ando Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Dec; 16(6):772-84. PubMed ID: 9533578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of film-screen combinations in contrast-detail diagram and with interactive image analysis. 3: Trimodal histograms of gray scale distribution in bar groups of lead pattern images].
    Hagemann G; Eichbaum G; Stamm G
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 May; 8(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 9645256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The evaluation of the performance of a new-concept screen-film system].
    Tosi G; Brambilla MG; De Crescenzo S
    Radiol Med; 1992 Nov; 84(5):641-4. PubMed ID: 1475429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a new x-ray film with reduced crossover.
    Rao GU; Fatouros PP
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(3):226-8. PubMed ID: 470848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The spatial resolution of the digital storage phosphor system. The monitor and film compared].
    Nessi R; Castellana L; Paruccini N; Blanc M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1995 Sep; 90(3):298-302. PubMed ID: 7501837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Test report on the system components for film processing by the middle-format technology].
    Furnell EC; Pohlenz O
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Dec; 38(12):392-6. PubMed ID: 4089483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Digital radiology. Clinical experience].
    Stacul F; Smathers RL
    Radiol Med; 1985 Nov; 71(11):732-9. PubMed ID: 4095289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of the darkroom in radiograph quality control.
    Wolfgang L
    N Y State Dent J; 1998; 64(6):26-9. PubMed ID: 9707980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Control of film processing and dark room lighting].
    von Volkmann T
    Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1986; 27():54-66. PubMed ID: 3705127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of film-screen combination in a contrast detail diagram and with interactive image analysis. 1: Contrast detail diagram].
    Hagemann G; Eichbaum G
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Jul; 7(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 9340021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Thoracic radiography. Comparison of asymmetric screen-film, technic of mechanical homogenization, and conventional technics].
    Ciccotosto C; Bartelli F; Bellelli M; Gavelli G; Guidotti A; Pirronti T; Bonomo L
    Radiol Med; 1995; 90(1-2):24-32. PubMed ID: 7569092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of a standard x-ray film with a high-latitude film in thoracic diagnosis].
    Oestmann JW; Hendrickx PH; Rieder P; Geerlings H
    Rontgenblatter; 1986 Jan; 39(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 3952431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advantages of operating in the light.
    Dury IM
    Hospitals; 1975 Jan; 49(2):71, 74. PubMed ID: 1109364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the image quality of 105mm film with conventional film.
    Skucas J; Gorski JW
    Radiology; 1976 Feb; 118(2):433-7. PubMed ID: 1250980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.