321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11450721)
21. A comparative study of computerised visual field testing and optic disc morphometric parameters in the follow-up of primary open angle glaucoma.
Macri A; Rolando M; Corallo G; Iester M; Verrastro G; Calabria G
Eye (Lond); 1998; 12 ( Pt 6)():916-20. PubMed ID: 10325985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Study of the optic papilla and nerve fiber layer in glaucoma].
Mojon DS; Mermoud A
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 May; 214(5):295-9. PubMed ID: 10420371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Normal values of various papillary parameters and correlation to papillary size].
Funk J; Dieringer T; Grehn F
Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 2358272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Morphometric assessment of normal, suspect and glaucomatous optic discs with Stratus OCT and HRT II.
Iliev ME; Meyenberg A; Garweg JG
Eye (Lond); 2006 Nov; 20(11):1288-99. PubMed ID: 16179933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Optic nerve disc in unilateral myopia in children].
Koraszewska-Matuszewska B; Samochowiec-Donocik E; Pieczara E; Filipek E
Klin Oczna; 2002; 104(2):119-21. PubMed ID: 12174452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Correlation of disc morphology quantified on stereophotographs to results by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II, GDx variable corneal compensation, and visual field tests.
Saito H; Tsutsumi T; Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M
Ophthalmology; 2010 Feb; 117(2):282-9. PubMed ID: 19969361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Neuroretinal rim in eyes with simple optic atrophy].
Jonas JB; Fernández MC; Nguyen NX; Naumann GO
Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(5):502-4. PubMed ID: 1757039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Correlations between morphologic measurements of the optic disc using planimetric tests and changes in the visual field in patients with glaucoma].
Szelepin L; Cwirko M; Nizankowska MH; Koziorowska M
Klin Oczna; 1997; 99(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 9379662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Changes in the optic disc excavation of children affected by cerebral visual impairment: a tomographic analysis.
Ruberto G; Salati R; Milano G; Bertone C; Tinelli C; Fazzi E; Guagliano R; Signorini S; Borgatti R; Bianchi A; Bianchi PE
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 47(2):484-8. PubMed ID: 16431940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Glaucomatous optic neuropathy evaluation (GONE) project: the effect of monoscopic versus stereoscopic viewing conditions on optic nerve evaluation.
Chan HH; Ong DN; Kong YX; O'Neill EC; Pandav SS; Coote MA; Crowston JG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 157(5):936-44. PubMed ID: 24508161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sensitivity and specificity of optic disc parameters in chronic glaucoma.
Damms T; Dannheim F
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 34(7):2246-50. PubMed ID: 8505205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Morphology of the optic papilla in glaucoma. II. Secondary chronic open angle glaucoma].
Budde WM; Jonas JB
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 Oct; 215(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 10572883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A geometric morphometric assessment of the optic cup in glaucoma.
Sanfilippo PG; Cardini A; Sigal IA; Ruddle JB; Chua BE; Hewitt AW; Mackey DA
Exp Eye Res; 2010 Sep; 91(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 20599965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Inter-observer variation in clinical optic disc biometry.
Pyott AA; Montgomery DM
Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 3)():452-6. PubMed ID: 8224306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Agreement between ophthalmologists and optometrists in optic disc assessment: training implications for glaucoma co-management.
Harper R; Radi N; Reeves BC; Fenerty C; Spencer AF; Batterbury M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 239(5):342-50. PubMed ID: 11482337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Determination of the neuroretinal rim area using the horizontal and vertical disc and cup diameters.
Jonas JB; Montgomery DM
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1995 Nov; 233(11):690-3. PubMed ID: 8566824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Healthy optic discs with large cups--a diagnostic challenge in glaucoma].
Mardin CY; Horn F; Viestenz A; Lämmer R; Jünemann A
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Apr; 223(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 16639669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Optic nerve head analysis using the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (CSLO) of big cups versus normal cups].
Ouertani A; Tounsi L; Khammari C; Bouden J; Mili-Boussen I
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 19515313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma.
Spaeth GL; Henderer J; Liu C; Kesen M; Altangerel U; Bayer A; Katz LJ; Myers J; Rhee D; Steinmann W
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2002; 100():181-5; discussion 185-6. PubMed ID: 12545692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
