These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11450876)

  • 1. Comparison of intradiscal pressures and spinal fixator loads for different body positions and exercises.
    Rohlmannt A; Claes LE; Bergmannt G; Graichen F; Neef P; Wilke HJ
    Ergonomics; 2001 Jun; 44(8):781-94. PubMed ID: 11450876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ISSLS prize winner: A novel approach to determine trunk muscle forces during flexion and extension: a comparison of data from an in vitro experiment and in vivo measurements.
    Wilke HJ; Rohlmann A; Neller S; Graichen F; Claes L; Bergmann G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Dec; 28(23):2585-93. PubMed ID: 14652475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of trunk muscle forces for flexion and extension by using a validated finite element model of the lumbar spine and measured in vivo data.
    Rohlmann A; Bauer L; Zander T; Bergmann G; Wilke HJ
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(6):981-9. PubMed ID: 16549091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
    Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Loads on a telemeterized vertebral body replacement measured in two patients.
    Rohlmann A; Graichen F; Kayser R; Bender A; Bergmann G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(11):1170-9. PubMed ID: 18469689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Loads on a telemeterized vertebral body replacement measured in three patients within the first postoperative month.
    Rohlmann A; Graichen F; Bender A; Kayser R; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Feb; 23(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 17983694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life.
    Wilke HJ; Neef P; Caimi M; Hoogland T; Claes LE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Apr; 24(8):755-62. PubMed ID: 10222525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sitting versus standing: does the intradiscal pressure cause disc degeneration or low back pain?
    Claus A; Hides J; Moseley GL; Hodges P
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Aug; 18(4):550-8. PubMed ID: 17346987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Telemeterized load measurement using instrumented spinal internal fixators in a patient with degenerative instability.
    Rohlmann A; Bergmann G; Graichen F; Mayer HM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Dec; 20(24):2683-9. PubMed ID: 8747246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A biomechanical assessment of disc pressures in the lumbosacral spine in response to external unloading forces.
    Ferrara L; Triano JJ; Sohn MJ; Song E; Lee DD
    Spine J; 2005; 5(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 16153584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between everyday activities and spinal shrinkage.
    van Deursen LL; van Deursen DL; Snijders CJ; Wilke HJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Jun; 20(5):547-50. PubMed ID: 15836943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems.
    Sato K; Kikuchi S; Yonezawa T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Dec; 24(23):2468-74. PubMed ID: 10626309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is it possible to simulate physiologic loading conditions by applying pure moments? A comparison of in vivo and in vitro load components in an internal fixator.
    Wilke HJ; Rohlmann A; Neller S; Schultheiss M; Bergmann G; Graichen F; Claes LE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(6):636-42. PubMed ID: 11246374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are the spines of calf, pig and sheep suitable models for pre-clinical implant tests?
    Kettler A; Liakos L; Haegele B; Wilke HJ
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2186-92. PubMed ID: 17721711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Realistic loading conditions for upper body bending.
    Rohlmann A; Zander T; Rao M; Bergmann G
    J Biomech; 2009 May; 42(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19268291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of body position and axial load on spinal canal morphology: an MRI study of central spinal stenosis.
    Madsen R; Jensen TS; Pope M; Sørensen JS; Bendix T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18165750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro fixator rod loading after transforaminal compared to anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kettler A; Niemeyer T; Issler L; Merk U; Mahalingam M; Werner K; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):435-42. PubMed ID: 16442678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Change in spine height measurements following sustained mid-range and end-range flexion of the lumbar spine.
    Gerke DA; Brismée JM; Sizer PS; Dedrick GS; James CR
    Appl Ergon; 2011 Jan; 42(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 20833386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Loading on internal spinal fixation devices].
    Rohlmann A; Bergmann G; Graichen F; Weber U
    Orthopade; 1999 May; 28(5):451-7. PubMed ID: 10394604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.