BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11450959)

  • 1. A combined architectural and kinetic interpretation model for breast MR images.
    Schnall MD; Rosten S; Englander S; Orel SG; Nunes LW
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Jul; 8(7):591-7. PubMed ID: 11450959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study.
    Schnall MD; Blume J; Bluemke DA; DeAngelis GA; DeBruhl N; Harms S; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hylton N; Kuhl CK; Pisano ED; Causer P; Schnitt SJ; Thickman D; Stelling CB; Weatherall PT; Lehman C; Gatsonis CA
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 16373758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Added value of breathhold diffusion-weighted MRI in detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma lesions compared with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
    Xu PJ; Yan FH; Wang JH; Lin J; Ji Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 29(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 19161186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis of adrenal adenomas and malignant adrenal masses.
    Inan N; Arslan A; Akansel G; Anik Y; Balci NC; Demirci A
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):154-62. PubMed ID: 17466481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
    Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discrimination of MR images of breast masses with fractal-interpolation function models.
    Penn AI; Bolinger L; Schnall MD; Loew MH
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Mar; 6(3):156-63. PubMed ID: 10898034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Architectural-based interpretations of breast MR imaging.
    Nunes LW
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2001 May; 9(2):303-20, vi. PubMed ID: 11493421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in MR-mammography (MRM): do we really need whole lesion time curve distribution analysis?
    Baltzer PA; Renz DM; Kullnig PE; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 19268855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters.
    Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Wiberg MK
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Dec; 11(12):1344-54. PubMed ID: 15596372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features.
    Goto M; Ito H; Akazawa K; Kubota T; Kizu O; Yamada K; Nishimura T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
    Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preoperative 3T MR imaging of rectal cancer: local staging accuracy using a two-dimensional and three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence.
    Fütterer JJ; Yakar D; Strijk SP; Barentsz JO
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 18164156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The breast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI: preliminary results of a quantitative analysis.
    Di Nallo AM; Crecco M; Ortenzia O; Ordonez R; Abate A; Benassi M
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Jun; 26(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 17725104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal post-contrast timing of breast MR image acquisition for architectural feature analysis.
    Nunes LW; Englander SA; Charafeddine R; Schnall MD
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Jul; 16(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 12112502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiation of benign and malignant sub-1 cm breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
    Gibbs P; Liney GP; Lowry M; Kneeshaw PJ; Turnbull LW
    Breast; 2004 Apr; 13(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 15019691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative 2- and 3-dimensional analysis of pharmacokinetic model-derived variables for breast lesions in dynamic, contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
    Hauth EA; Jaeger HJ; Maderwald S; Muehler A; Kimmig R; Forsting M
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 May; 66(2):300-8. PubMed ID: 17658235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Classification of breast lesions based on a dual S-shaped logistic model in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Dang Y; Guo L; Lv D; Wang X; Zhang J
    Sci China Life Sci; 2011 Oct; 54(10):889-96. PubMed ID: 22038000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Angle between 1 and 4 min gives the most significant difference in time-intensity curves between benign disease and breast cancer: analysis of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in 103 patients with breast lesions.
    Hara M; Watanabe T; Okumura A; Kato K; Mohri N; Ishikawa M; Mizuno A; Takeyama H
    Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 19712811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
    Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High-spatial-resolution MR imaging of focal breast masses: interpretation model based on kinetic and morphological parameters.
    Tozaki M; Igarashi T; Matsushima S; Fukuda K
    Radiat Med; 2005 Feb; 23(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15786751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.