BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11450961)

  • 1. Components-of-variance models for random-effects ROC analysis: the case of unequal variance structures across modalities.
    Beiden SV; Wagner RF; Campbell G; Metz CE; Jiang Y
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Jul; 8(7):605-15. PubMed ID: 11450961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of uncertainties in estimates of components of variance in multivariate ROC analysis.
    Beiden SV; Wagner RF; Campbell G; Chan HP
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Jul; 8(7):616-22. PubMed ID: 11450962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
    Wang F; Gatsonis CA
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptually based FROC analysis.
    Arora R; Kundel HL; Beam CA
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1567-74. PubMed ID: 16321746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reader variability in mammography and its implications for expected utility over the population of readers and cases.
    Wagner RF; Beam CA; Beiden SV
    Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(6):561-72. PubMed ID: 15534338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A marginal model approach for analysis of multi-reader multi-test receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
    Song X; Zhou XH
    Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 15772108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 16554220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continuous versus categorical data for ROC analysis: some quantitative considerations.
    Wagner RF; Beiden SV; Metz CE
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Apr; 8(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 11293781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of medical imaging systems and computer aids: a tutorial review.
    Wagner RF; Metz CE; Campbell G
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):723-48. PubMed ID: 17502262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reader studies for validation of CAD systems.
    Gallas BD; Brown DG
    Neural Netw; 2008; 21(2-3):387-97. PubMed ID: 18215501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
    Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combining dependent tests to compare the diagnostic accuracies--a non-parametric approach.
    Yang Y; Jin Z
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1239-50. PubMed ID: 16158406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three methods for analysing correlated ROC curves: a comparison in real data sets from multi-reader, multi-case studies with a factorial design.
    Toledano AY
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2919-33. PubMed ID: 12953288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC.
    Gallas BD
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 16488848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method.
    Dorfman DD; Berbaum KS; Metz CE
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Sep; 27(9):723-31. PubMed ID: 1399456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Components-of-variance models and multiple-bootstrap experiments: an alternative method for random-effects, receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Beiden SV; Wagner RF; Campbell G
    Acad Radiol; 2000 May; 7(5):341-9. PubMed ID: 10803614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Indexes for three-class classification performance assessment--an empirical comparison.
    Sampat MP; Patel AC; Wang Y; Gupta S; Kan CW; Bovik AC; Markey MK
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 May; 13(3):300-12. PubMed ID: 19171528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review of the new methodology of analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Ikeda M; Ishigaki T; Yamauchi K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 2():837-40. PubMed ID: 10384578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
    Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.