172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11450966)
1. Effect of training with the american college of radiology breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon on mammographic interpretation skills in developing countries.
Lehman CD; Miller L; Rutter CM; Tsu V
Acad Radiol; 2001 Jul; 8(7):647-50. PubMed ID: 11450966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Simulation Screening Mammography Module Created for Instruction and Assessment: Radiology Residents vs National Benchmarks.
Poot JD; Chetlen AL
Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1454-1462. PubMed ID: 27637285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A dedicated BI-RADS training programme: effect on the inter-observer variation among screening radiologists.
Timmers JM; van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ; Verbeek AL; den Heeten GJ; Broeders MJ
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2184-8. PubMed ID: 21899969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Frankel SD; Ominsky SH; Sickles EA; Ernster V
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1998 Dec; 90(23):1801-9. PubMed ID: 9839520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographic screening and reporting: a need for standardisation. A review.
Akhigbe AO; Igbinedion BO
Niger Postgrad Med J; 2013 Dec; 20(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 24633281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of an online, publicly accessible naive Bayesian decision support tool for mammographic mass lesions based on the American College of Radiology (ACR) BI-RADS lexicon.
Benndorf M; Kotter E; Langer M; Herda C; Wu Y; Burnside ES
Eur Radiol; 2015 Jun; 25(6):1768-75. PubMed ID: 25576230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description.
Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms.
Lehman C; Holt S; Peacock S; White E; Urban N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12076896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.
Elmore JG; Jackson SL; Abraham L; Miglioretti DL; Carney PA; Geller BM; Yankaskas BC; Kerlikowske K; Onega T; Rosenberg RD; Sickles EA; Buist DS
Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):641-51. PubMed ID: 19864507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification.
Obenauer S; Hermann KP; Grabbe E
Eur Radiol; 2005 May; 15(5):1027-36. PubMed ID: 15856253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS).
Liberman L; Menell JH
Radiol Clin North Am; 2002 May; 40(3):409-30, v. PubMed ID: 12117184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists.
Barlow WE; Chi C; Carney PA; Taplin SH; D'Orsi C; Cutter G; Hendrick RE; Elmore JG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1840-50. PubMed ID: 15601640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiographers supporting radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography: a viable strategy to meet the shortage in the number of radiologists.
Torres-Mejía G; Smith RA; Carranza-Flores Mde L; Bogart A; Martínez-Matsushita L; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Ortega-Olvera C; Montemayor-Varela E; Angeles-Llerenas A; Bautista-Arredondo S; Sánchez-González G; Martínez-Montañez OG; Uscanga-Sánchez SR; Lazcano-Ponce E; Hernández-Ávila M
BMC Cancer; 2015 May; 15():410. PubMed ID: 25975383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. BI-RADS decoded: detailed guidance on potentially confusing issues.
D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS
Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):751-63, v. PubMed ID: 17888766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic performance of breast technologists in reading mammograms in a clinical patient population.
van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K
Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Mar; 64(4):442-50. PubMed ID: 20456190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The American College of Radiology's mammography lexicon: barking up the wrong tree?
Heilbrunn KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):593-4. PubMed ID: 8109502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon.
Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Lo JY; Williford ME; Floyd CE
Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):817-22. PubMed ID: 7644649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving Performance of Mammographic Breast Positioning in an Academic Radiology Practice.
Pal S; Ikeda DM; Jesinger RA; Mickelsen LJ; Chen CA; Larson DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Apr; 210(4):807-815. PubMed ID: 29412019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of Training on Qualitative Mammographic Density Assessment.
Raza S; Mackesy MM; Winkler NS; Hurwitz S; Birdwell RL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Mar; 13(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 26944039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history.
Burnside ES; Sickles EA; Bassett LW; Rubin DL; Lee CH; Ikeda DM; Mendelson EB; Wilcox PA; Butler PF; D'Orsi CJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Dec; 6(12):851-60. PubMed ID: 19945040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
