These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11451090)

  • 1. Scientific certainty: research versus forensic perspectives.
    Bird SJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Jul; 46(4):978-81. PubMed ID: 11451090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Opinions and testimony of expert witnesses and independent medical evaluators.
    Schofferman J
    Pain Med; 2007; 8(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 17610460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Observations on the adversary system and the role of the forensic scientist: "scientific truth" v. "legal truth".
    Pollack S
    J Forensic Sci; 1973 Jul; 18(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 4782656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Academics face abuse of rules designed to protect research.
    Cowen RC
    Christ Sci Monitor; 1998 Mar; ():13. PubMed ID: 11647561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Promoting ethical and objective practice in the medicolegal arena of disability evaluation.
    Martelli MF; Zasler ND; Johnson-Greene D
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2001 Aug; 12(3):571-85. PubMed ID: 11478189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of litigation on neurologic research.
    Schachtman NA
    Neurology; 2007 Jul; 69(5):495; author reply 495-6. PubMed ID: 17664415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Legal science versus science in law.
    Aldisert RJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1972 Jul; 17(3):345-8. PubMed ID: 4669581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Whistleblowing in biomedical research: report from a workshop.
    Mishkin B
    IRB; 1982 Feb; 4(2):8-9. PubMed ID: 11658314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conflicts of interest in medical science: peer usage, peer review and 'CoI consultancy'.
    Charlton BG
    Med Hypotheses; 2004; 63(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15236772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A candle in the dark].
    Guerrero R
    Microbiologia; 1997 Jun; 13(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 9333302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Rejection of a forensic expert because of a private opinion given by him earlier].
    Jessnitzer K
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1973 Nov; 98(48):2315-6. PubMed ID: 4762832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Legal and medico-scientific terminology and the determination of the time of death].
    Liebhardt EW; Wuermeling HB
    Munch Med Wochenschr; 1968 Jul; 110(28):1661-5. PubMed ID: 5754860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The physician in criminal court].
    Durigon M
    Rev Prat; 2002 Apr; 52(7):743-5. PubMed ID: 12032961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Keeping criticism at bay: suggestions for forensic psychiatry experts.
    Friend A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):406-12. PubMed ID: 14974793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "The whole truth" versus "the admissible truth": an ethics dilemma for expert witnesses.
    Gutheil TG; Hauser M; White MS; Spruiell G; Strasburger LH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 14974796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [State and tasks of further development of scientific research in forensic medicine and forensic chemistry].
    Gromov AP; Kapustin AV
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1982; 25(4):10-4. PubMed ID: 7179374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Methodics of analysis of specialized equipment competitiveness for conduction of forensic examinations].
    Kolkutin VV; Pinchuk PV; Vasnetsov OA
    Voen Med Zh; 2005 Oct; 326(10):52-6. PubMed ID: 16353876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Commentary: Role conflict for the witness consultant.
    Strasburger LH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(1):46-7. PubMed ID: 11302385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Landmarks and hallmarks in scientific evidence.
    Conrad E
    J Forensic Sci; 1971 Oct; 16(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 5139274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reconstruction: a useful tool in forensic sciences.
    Brandt-Casadevall C; Krompecher T; Mangin P
    Med Sci Law; 2001 Jan; 41(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 11219131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.