These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11451264)

  • 1. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: a multicenter, randomized trial. Investigators of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #385, the Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation (AWESOME).
    Morrison DA; Sethi G; Sacks J; Henderson W; Grover F; Sedlis S; Esposito R; Ramanathan K; Weiman D; Saucedo J; Antakli T; Paramesh V; Pett S; Vernon S; Birjiniuk V; Welt F; Krucoff M; Wolfe W; Lucke JC; Mediratta S; Booth D; Barbiere C; Lewis D;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2001 Jul; 38(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 11451264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass graft surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: The VA AWESOME multicenter registry: comparison with the randomized clinical trial.
    Morrison DA; Sethi G; Sacks J; Henderson W; Grover F; Sedlis S; Esposito R; Ramanathan KB; Weiman D; Talley JD; Saucedo J; Antakli T; Paramesh V; Pett S; Vernon S; Birjiniuk V; Welt F; Krucoff M; Wolfe W; Lucke JC; Mediratta S; Booth D; Barbiere C; Lewis D;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2002 Jan; 39(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 11788218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass graft surgery for diabetic patients with unstable angina and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: outcome of diabetic patients in the AWESOME randomized trial and registry.
    Sedlis SP; Morrison DA; Lorin JD; Esposito R; Sethi G; Sacks J; Henderson W; Grover F; Ramanathan KB; Weiman D; Saucedo J; Antakli T; Paramesh V; Pett S; Vernon S; Birjiniuk V; Welt F; Krucoff M; Wolfe W; Lucke JC; Mediratta S; Booth D; Murphy E; Ward H; Miller L; Kiesz S; Barbiere C; Lewis D;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2002 Nov; 40(9):1555-66. PubMed ID: 12427406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus repeat bypass surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia: AWESOME randomized trial and registry experience with post-CABG patients.
    Morrison DA; Sethi G; Sacks J; Henderson WG; Grover F; Sedlis S; Esposito R;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2002 Dec; 40(11):1951-4. PubMed ID: 12475454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Percutaneous intervention versus coronary bypass surgery for patients older than 70 years of age with high-risk unstable angina.
    Ramanathan KB; Weiman DS; Sacks J; Morrison DA; Sedlis S; Sethi G; Henderson WG
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Oct; 80(4):1340-6. PubMed ID: 16181866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multicenter, randomized trial of percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass surgery in high-risk unstable angina patients. The AWESOME (Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #385, angina with extremely serious operative mortality evaluation) investigators from the Cooperative Studies Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
    Morrison DA; Sethi G; Sacks J; Grover F; Sedlis S; Esposito R; Ramanathan KB; Weiman D; Krucoff M; Duhaylongsod F; Raya T; Pett S; Vernon S; Birjiniuk V; Booth D; Robinson C; Talley JD; Antckli T; Murphy E; Floten H; Curcovic V; Lucke JC; Lewis D; Barbiere C; Henderson W
    Control Clin Trials; 1999 Dec; 20(6):601-19. PubMed ID: 10588300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health-related quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass surgery in high-risk patients with medically refractory ischemia.
    Rumsfeld JS; Magid DJ; Plomondon ME; Sacks J; Henderson W; Hlatky M; Sethi G; Morrison DA;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2003 May; 41(10):1732-8. PubMed ID: 12767656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PCI versus CABG versus medical therapy in 2006.
    Morrison D
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2006 Oct; 54(5):643-72. PubMed ID: 17019400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.
    Head SJ; Milojevic M; Daemen J; Ahn JM; Boersma E; Christiansen EH; Domanski MJ; Farkouh ME; Flather M; Fuster V; Hlatky MA; Holm NR; Hueb WA; Kamalesh M; Kim YH; Mäkikallio T; Mohr FW; Papageorgiou G; Park SJ; Rodriguez AE; Sabik JF; Stables RH; Stone GW; Serruys PW; Kappetein AP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 72(4):386-398. PubMed ID: 30025574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for patients with medically refractory rest angina pectoris and high risk of adverse outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Morrison DA; Sacks J; Grover F; Hammermeister KE
    Am J Cardiol; 1995 Feb; 75(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 7832130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coronary angioplasty for elderly patients with "high risk" unstable angina: short-term outcomes and long-term survival.
    Morrison DA; Bies RD; Sacks J
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 Feb; 29(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 9014986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafts versus percutaneous coronary intervention for revascularization of high-risk patients.
    Stroupe KT; Morrison DA; Hlatky MA; Barnett PG; Cao L; Lyttle C; Hynes DM; Henderson WG;
    Circulation; 2006 Sep; 114(12):1251-7. PubMed ID: 16966588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
    Buszman P; Szkróbka I; Gruszka A; Parma R; Tendera Z; Leśko B; Wilczyński M; Bochenek T; Wojakowski W; Bochenek A; Tendera M
    Am J Cardiol; 2007 Jan; 99(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 17196458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic review: the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Bravata DM; Gienger AL; McDonald KM; Sundaram V; Perez MV; Varghese R; Kapoor JR; Ardehali R; Owens DK; Hlatky MA
    Ann Intern Med; 2007 Nov; 147(10):703-16. PubMed ID: 17938385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Balancing benefit against risk in the choice of therapy for coronary artery disease. Lesson from prospective, randomized, clinical trials of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Morrison DA; Sacks J
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2003 Oct; 51(5):585-97. PubMed ID: 14551526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study: 5-year follow-up of revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease.
    Kapur A; Bartolini D; Finlay MC; Qureshi AC; Flather M; Strange JW; Hall RJ
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2010 Jan; 11(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 19797974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coronary artery stents in the treatment of ischaemic heart disease: a rapid and systematic review.
    Meads C; Cummins C; Jolly K; Stevens A; Burls A; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(23):1-153. PubMed ID: 11074393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
    Mäkikallio T; Holm NR; Lindsay M; Spence MS; Erglis A; Menown IB; Trovik T; Eskola M; Romppanen H; Kellerth T; Ravkilde J; Jensen LO; Kalinauskas G; Linder RB; Pentikainen M; Hervold A; Banning A; Zaman A; Cotton J; Eriksen E; Margus S; Sørensen HT; Nielsen PH; Niemelä M; Kervinen K; Lassen JF; Maeng M; Oldroyd K; Berg G; Walsh SJ; Hanratty CG; Kumsars I; Stradins P; Steigen TK; Fröbert O; Graham AN; Endresen PC; Corbascio M; Kajander O; Trivedi U; Hartikainen J; Anttila V; Hildick-Smith D; Thuesen L; Christiansen EH;
    Lancet; 2016 Dec; 388(10061):2743-2752. PubMed ID: 27810312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized trial of stents versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease.
    Park SJ; Kim YH; Park DW; Yun SC; Ahn JM; Song HG; Lee JY; Kim WJ; Kang SJ; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Chung CH; Lee JW; Lim DS; Rha SW; Lee SG; Gwon HC; Kim HS; Chae IH; Jang Y; Jeong MH; Tahk SJ; Seung KB
    N Engl J Med; 2011 May; 364(18):1718-27. PubMed ID: 21463149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do differences in repeat revascularization explain the antianginal benefits of bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention?: implications for future treatment comparisons.
    Arnold SV; Magnuson EA; Wang K; Serruys PW; Kappetein AP; Mohr FW; Cohen DJ;
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2012 May; 5(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 22496114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.