These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11452976)
1. Increase competition to stabilize drug prices. Miller HI Science; 2001 Jul; 293(5528):213-4. PubMed ID: 11452976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Drug prices: real problem, wrong solution. Kennedy D Science; 2001 Jun; 292(5523):1797. PubMed ID: 11397914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. NIH urged to cap profits made on publicly funded research. Macilwain C Nature; 2000 Jul; 406(6791):5. PubMed ID: 10894508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Drug pricing. NIH report knocks tax on blockbusters. Kaiser J Science; 2001 Aug; 293(5535):1575. PubMed ID: 11533456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New "21st Century Cures" Legislation: Speed and Ease vs Science. Kesselheim AS; Avorn J JAMA; 2017 Feb; 317(6):581-582. PubMed ID: 28056124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Universities unnerved by revised rules for sharing NIH research. Jennings C Nature; 2004 Aug; 430(7003):953. PubMed ID: 15329680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Controversial bill to boost US medical research funding is passed in House of Representatives. McCarthy M BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3831. PubMed ID: 26174512 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Researchers accused of wanting to rob the poor to give to NIH. Wadman M Nature; 1998 Aug; 394(6694):609. PubMed ID: 9716118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Is the stimulus working for you? Freeman R; Block F; Greenberg D; Levi M; Segal AM; Crow M; Teitelbaum MS Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):876-8. PubMed ID: 19829353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Divisiveness brings uncertainty. Stem-cell researchers look elsewhere for funding. Carlson J; Blesch G Mod Healthc; 2011 Aug; 41(31):8-9. PubMed ID: 21853567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. US stimulus bill provides $10 billion boost to NIH. Lancet Neurol; 2009 Apr; 8(4):301. PubMed ID: 19296916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Election 2002 update: the fallout for NIH appropriations. Olds JL Anat Rec B New Anat; 2003 Jan; 270(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 12526060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Exclusive: US National Science Foundation reveals first details on foreign-influence investigations. Silver A Nature; 2020 Jul; 583(7816):342. PubMed ID: 32641793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Biobusiness on campus: commercialization of university-developed biomedical technologies. Dueker KS Food Drug Law J; 1997; 52(4):453-509. PubMed ID: 10346675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Congress Passes 2006 NIH Reform Act. Lang L Gastroenterology; 2007 Feb; 132(2):474-5. PubMed ID: 17261310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Managing science. House votes to kill grants, limit travel to meetings. Kaiser J Science; 2004 Sep; 305(5691):1688. PubMed ID: 15375232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. U.S. science policy. NIH stimulus plan triggers flood of applications--and anxiety. Kaiser J Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5925):318-9. PubMed ID: 19372395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Should the patent system for new medicines be abolished? DiMasi JA; Grabowski HG Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Nov; 82(5):488-90. PubMed ID: 17952100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetics. DNA patenting and licensing. Henry MR; Cho MK; Weaver MA; Merz JF Science; 2002 Aug; 297(5585):1279. PubMed ID: 12193770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]