These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11453362)
1. The Gisborne Inquiry--what can we learn? Richardson A N Z Med J; 2001 May; 114(1132):236-8. PubMed ID: 11453362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. And now the failure of cervical screening. N Z Med J; 2001 May; 114(1132):221-2. PubMed ID: 11453354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How not to organise a cervical screening programme. Skegg DC N Z Med J; 1989 Oct; 102(877):527-8. PubMed ID: 2797586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening the hard to reach: improving morbidity and mortality from cervical cancer in New Zealand. Sykes P; Sadler L; Priest P N Z Med J; 2008 Jul; 121(1277):5-7. PubMed ID: 18677325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New cervical cancer screening guidelines: the other side of group health care "rights". Austin RM Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Mar; 30(3):208-10. PubMed ID: 14986304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical Cancer Inquiry. N Z Nurs Forum; 1988 Aug; 16(3):5-6. PubMed ID: 3419625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Lessons from a cervical screening programme: are they transferable? Fleischl J Nurs Prax N Z; 1993 Jul; 8(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 8364340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening the only option to prevent cervical cancer. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2005; 44(159):I. PubMed ID: 16554856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical screening programme omitted from article. Ponter E Nurs N Z; 1998 Feb; 4(1):3. PubMed ID: 9555403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical screening. Ponter E; McSherry A N Z Med J; 1994 Nov; 107(990):494-5. PubMed ID: 7970371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Creating favorable conditions for organized screening of cervical cancer]. Baudier F Sante Publique; 2000 May; 12 Spec No():5-10. PubMed ID: 10989624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Routine audit is an ethical requirement of screening. Sasieni P; Cuzick J BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7295):1179. PubMed ID: 11379578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries. Sankaranarayanan R; Budukh AM; Rajkumar R Bull World Health Organ; 2001; 79(10):954-62. PubMed ID: 11693978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cancer inquiry at National Women's Hospital. Adams D N Z Med J; 1992 Jul; 105(938):297-8. PubMed ID: 1495672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Progress in cervical screening in New Zealand. Straton J N Z Med J; 1994 Jul; 107(981):261-2. PubMed ID: 8022580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. What future for cervical screening? Keene L N Z Nurs J; 1988 Mar; 81(3):18-20. PubMed ID: 3380476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodology for reorganization of the cervical cancer program in Chile. Salas I Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 16504420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical screening. Jarman J N Z Med J; 1992 Jul; 105(938):297. PubMed ID: 1495671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]