These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11453475)

  • 1. Effects of ring diameter and wire tension on the axial biomechanics of four-ring circular external skeletal fixator constructs.
    Cross AR; Lewis DD; Murphy ST; Rigaud S; Madison JB; Kehoe MM; Rapoff AJ
    Am J Vet Res; 2001 Jul; 62(7):1025-30. PubMed ID: 11453475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Axial characteristics of circular external skeletal fixator single ring constructs.
    Lewis DD; Bronson DG; Cross AR; Welch RD; Kubilis PS
    Vet Surg; 2001; 30(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 11443601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Axial stiffness and ring deformation of complete and incomplete single ring circular external skeletal fixator constructs.
    Hudson CC; Lewis DD; Cross AR; Horodyski M; Banks SA; Pozzi A
    Am J Vet Res; 2012 Dec; 73(12):2021-8. PubMed ID: 23176434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanics of Supplemental Drop Wire and Half-Pin Fixation Elements in Single Ring Circular External Fixator Constructs.
    Lewis RA; Lewis DD; Anderson CL; Hudson CC; Coggeshall JD; Iorgulescu AD; Banks SA
    Vet Surg; 2016 May; 45(4):471-9. PubMed ID: 27009685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of various distal ring-block configurations on the biomechanical properties of circular external skeletal fixators for use in dogs and cats.
    Cross AR; Lewis DD; Rigaud S; Rapoff AJ
    Am J Vet Res; 2004 Apr; 65(4):393-8. PubMed ID: 15077678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A biomechanical evaluation of three drop wire configurations.
    Arango J; Lewis DD; Hudson CC; Horodyski M
    Vet Surg; 2013 Aug; 42(6):669-77. PubMed ID: 23796078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are circular external fixators weakened by the use of hemispheric washers?
    Marcellin-Little DJ; Roe SC; Rovesti GL; Bosio A; Ferretti A
    Vet Surg; 2002; 31(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 12094351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of a circular external skeletal fixator construct to pin and tension band wire fixation for the stabilization of olecranon osteotomies in dogs: a cadaveric study.
    Halling KB; Lewis DD; Cross AR; Sammy RJ; Rapoff AJ
    Vet Surg; 2003; 32(4):324-35. PubMed ID: 12865994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A biomechanical comparison of three hybrid linear-circular external fixator constructs.
    Hudson CC; Lewis DD; Cross AR; Dunbar NJ; Horodyski M; Banks SA; Pozzi A
    Vet Surg; 2012 Nov; 41(8):954-65. PubMed ID: 22957475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical evaluation of transosseous wire rope configurations in a large animal external fixator.
    Rapoff AJ; Markel MD; Vanderby R
    Am J Vet Res; 1995 May; 56(5):694-9. PubMed ID: 7661467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of a circular external skeletal fixation device for the management of long bone osteotomies in large ruminants: an experimental study.
    Aithal HP; Singh GR; Hoque M; Maiti SK; Kinjavdekar P; Pawde AM; Setia HC;
    J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med; 2004 Aug; 51(6):284-93. PubMed ID: 15485564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical evaluation of external skeletal fixator-intramedullary pin tie-in configurations applied to cadaveral humeri from red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis).
    Van Wettere AJ; Redig PT; Wallace LJ; Bourgeault CA; Bechtold JE
    J Avian Med Surg; 2009 Dec; 23(4):277-85. PubMed ID: 20235458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro biomechanical study of a multiplanar circular external fixator applied to equine third metacarpal bones.
    Cervantes C; Madison JB; Miller GJ; Casar RS
    Vet Surg; 1996; 25(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8719080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro biomechanical testing of different configurations of acrylic external skeletal fixator constructs.
    Tyagi SK; Aithal HP; Kinjavdekar P; Amarpal ; Pawde AM; Srivastava T; Singh J; Madhu DN
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2015; 28(4):227-33. PubMed ID: 25998130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A biomechanical comparison of external skeletal fixation and plating for the stabilization of ilial osteotomies in dogs.
    Fitzpatrick N; Lewis D; Cross A
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2008; 21(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 18704242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the axial stiffness of carbon composite and aluminium alloy circular external skeletal fixator rings.
    Gauthier CM; Kowaleski MP; Gerard PD; Rovesti GL
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2013; 26(3):172-6. PubMed ID: 23677120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of alternate and simultaneous tensioning of wires in a single-ring fixator construct.
    Ryan S; Ehrhart N; Zuehlsdorff K; James S
    Vet Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 19152623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of different wire and screw combinations on the stiffness of a hybrid external fixator.
    Yang L; Saleeh M; Nayagam S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2000; 214(6):669-76. PubMed ID: 11201414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of strategies to adjust axial stiffness of a hybrid fixator.
    Socie MJ; Rovesti GL; Griffon DJ; Elkhatib O; Mudrock RN; Kurath P
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2012; 25(3):224-30. PubMed ID: 22451135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of wire tension on stiffness of tensioned fine wires in external fixation: a mechanical study.
    Antoci V; Voor MJ; Antoci V; Roberts CS
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2007 Sep; 36(9):473-6. PubMed ID: 17948150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.