These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11453620)

  • 21. Rats do not respond differently in the presence of stimuli signaling wheel-running reinforcers of different durations.
    Belke TW
    Behav Processes; 2007 May; 75(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 17293061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Responding for sucrose and wheel-running reinforcement: effect of body weight manipulation.
    Belke TW
    Behav Processes; 2004 Feb; 65(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 15222966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of sucrose availability and pre-running on the intrinsic value of wheel running as an operant and a reinforcing consequence.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD
    Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():35-42. PubMed ID: 24295809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of upcoming food-pellet delivery on subjects' responding for 1% sucrose reinforcement delivered by concurrent random-interval schedules.
    Weatherly JN; Grove C; Beste R
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 17503690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Relative and absolute reinforcement frequency as determinants of choice in concurrent variable interval schedules.
    Shah K; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1991 Feb; 43(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 2017573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sensitivity to pre- and post-reinforcer delays in self-control choice.
    Yamaguchi T; Saeki D; Ito M
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():8-12. PubMed ID: 26456039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Signal detection and matching: analyzing choice on concurrent variable-interval schedules.
    Logue AW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Jan; 39(1):107-27. PubMed ID: 6833936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Conditioned reinforcement value and choice.
    Preston RA; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Mar; 55(2):155-75. PubMed ID: 2037825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Preference pulses and the win-stay, fix-and-sample model of choice.
    Hachiga Y; Sakagami T; Silberberg A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):274-95. PubMed ID: 26420769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Concurrent VR VI schedules: primacy of molar control of preference and molecular control of response rates.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A; Sakagami T
    Learn Behav; 2010 Nov; 38(4):382-93. PubMed ID: 21048229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Choice and conditioned reinforcement.
    Fantino E; Freed D; Preston RA; Williams WA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Mar; 55(2):177-88. PubMed ID: 2037826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Varying wheel-running reinforcer duration within a session: effect on the revolution-postreinforcement pause relation.
    Belke TW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Mar; 73(2):225-39. PubMed ID: 10784011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of sucrose availability on wheel-running as an operant and as a reinforcing consequence on a multiple schedule: Additive effects of extrinsic and automatic reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jul; 116():1-7. PubMed ID: 25921837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evidence for positive, but not negative, behavioral contrast with wheel-running reinforcement on multiple variable-ratio schedules.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD
    Behav Processes; 2016 Dec; 133():37-43. PubMed ID: 27826007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of short-term prefeeding and body weight on wheel running and responding reinforced by the opportunity to run in a wheel.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD; Jensen K
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jul; 67(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15182920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.
    Shull RL; Pliskoff SS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Nov; 10(6):517-27. PubMed ID: 6080829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of qualitatively different reinforcers on the parameters of the response-strength equation.
    Petry NM; Heyman GM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jan; 61(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 8126394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.