306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11455180)
1. Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography of carotid bifurcation stenosis.
Binaghi S; Maeder P; Uské A; Meuwly JY; Devuyst G; Meuli RA
Eur Neurol; 2001; 46(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 11455180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [An evaluation of the carotid bifurcation and of the intracranial circle by angio-spiral computed tomography].
Bozzao A; Floris R; Villani A; Varrucciu V; Baviera ME; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 9717538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of carotid artery stenosis using histological specimens: a comparison of CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography.
Netuka D; Belšán T; Broulíková K; Mandys V; Charvát F; Malík J; Coufalová L; Bradáč O; Ostrý S; Beneš V
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Aug; 158(8):1505-14. PubMed ID: 27255656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy.
Patel SG; Collie DA; Wardlaw JM; Lewis SC; Wright AR; Gibson RJ; Sellar RJ
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2002 Jul; 73(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 12082040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of digital subtraction angiography, computed tomography angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography in grading of carotid artery stenosis in comparison with actual measurement in an in vitro model.
Smith JC; Watkins GE; Smith DC; Palmer EW; Abou-Zamzam AM; Zhao CX; Zhang WW
Ann Vasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 26(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 22285345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison with findings from histological specimens.
Netuka D; Ostrý S; Belsán T; Rucka D; Mandys V; Charvát F; Bradác O; Benes V
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2010 Jul; 152(7):1215-21. PubMed ID: 20411283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT angiography for the detection and characterization of carotid artery bifurcation disease.
Anderson GB; Ashforth R; Steinke DE; Ferdinandy R; Findlay JM
Stroke; 2000 Sep; 31(9):2168-74. PubMed ID: 10978047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Saba L; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Cartocci G; Di Mare L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Korn A; Bender B; Brodoefel H; Hauser TK; Danz S; Ernemann U; Thomas C
Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24343701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis: does a flow void represent severe stenosis?
Nederkoorn PJ; van der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; van der Lugt A; Bartels LW; Mali WP
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2002; 23(10):1779-84. PubMed ID: 12427639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating non-invasive medical imaging for diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis with ischemic cerebrovascular disease.
Lu X; Zhang W; Gui Q; Yu M; Guo Y
Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Jan; 116(1):112-5. PubMed ID: 12667401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical usefulness of and problems with three-dimensional CT angiography for the evaluation of arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional angiography, MRA, and ultrasound sonography.
Sameshima T; Futami S; Morita Y; Yokogami K; Miyahara S; Sameshima Y; Goya T; Wakisaka S
Surg Neurol; 1999 Mar; 51(3):301-8; discussion 308-9. PubMed ID: 10086495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; Mali WP; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; van der Graaf Y
J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 12368742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Non-invasive assessment of epiaortic vessels. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography with gadolinium, spiral computerized tomography angiography, and digital angiography].
Bozzao A; Floris R; Pocek M; Fasoli F; Garaci FG; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 2001; 101(1-2):48-53. PubMed ID: 11360753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Alvarez-Linera J; Benito-León J; Escribano J; Campollo J; Gesto R
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preliminary experience with MRA in evaluating the degree of carotid stenosis and plaque morphology using high-resolution sequences after gadofosveset trisodium (Vasovist) administration: comparison with CTA and DSA.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Geiger D; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2010 Jun; 115(4):634-47. PubMed ID: 20177976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in assessing carotid artery stenosis.
D'Onofrio M; Mansueto G; Faccioli N; Guarise A; Tamellini P; Bogina G; Pozzi Mucelli R
Radiol Med; 2006 Feb; 111(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 16623309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography, duplex ultrasound examination with surgical and histological findings of atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation disease.
Liberopoulos K; Kaponis A; Kokkinis K; Pagratis N; Nicolakopoulou Z; Douskou M; Stringaris K; Clonaris C; Balas P
Int Angiol; 1996 Jun; 15(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 8803637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Duyme M; Sahel M; Zouaoui A; Marsault C
Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
