These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11455377)

  • 1. Modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation? A comparative clinical trial.
    Gillgrass TJ; Benington PC; Millett DT; Newell J; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11455377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro comparison of orthodontic band cements.
    Millett DT; Duff S; Morrison L; Cummings A; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12532057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.
    Millett DT; Cummings A; Letters S; Roger E; Love J
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 14700267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An investigation into the use of two polyacid-modified composite resins (compomers) and a resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement used to retain orthodontic bands.
    Williams PH; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Jun; 27(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 15947223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.
    Ishikawa H; Komori A; Kojima I; Ando F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 11455379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enamel demineralization inhibition by cements at orthodontic band margins.
    VanMiller EJ; Donly KJ
    Am J Dent; 2003 Oct; 16(5):356-8. PubMed ID: 14677617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fluoride release and cariostatic potential of orthodontic adhesives with and without daily fluoride rinsing.
    Chin MY; Sandham A; Rumachik EN; Ruben JL; Huysmans MC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):547-53. PubMed ID: 19815157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Banding versus bonding of first permanent molars: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial.
    Nazir M; Walsh T; Mandall NA; Matthew S; Fox D
    J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 38(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 21677099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bond strength for orthodontic brackets contaminated by blood: composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Reddy L; Marker VA; Ellis E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 61(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 12618999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of orthodontic band cement at the cement-enamel and cement-band interfaces.
    Uysal T; Ramoglu SI; Ertas H; Ulker M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):534-9. PubMed ID: 20362915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer for band cementation? An in vitro study.
    Millett DT; Doubleday B; Alatsaris M; Love J; Wood D; Luther F; Devine D
    J Orthod; 2005 Mar; 32(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 15784942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative laboratory investigation of dual-cured vs. conventional glass ionomer cements for band cementation.
    Millett DT; Kamahli K; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Aug; 68(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 9709835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical evaluation of bonding with glass ionomer cement.
    Ravindranath VK; Kapoor DN; Sharma VP
    J Pierre Fauchard Acad; 1993 Mar; 7(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 9791242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An ex vivo evaluation of resin-modified glass polyalkenoates and polyacid-modified composite resins as orthodontic band cements.
    Knox J; Chye KY; Durning P
    J Orthod; 2004 Dec; 31(4):323-8; discussion 301-2. PubMed ID: 15608348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tensile bond force of glass ionomer cements in direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro comparative study.
    Rezk-Lega F; Ogaard B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 1833971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimizing preparation design for metal-free composite resin crowns.
    Ohlmann B; Gruber R; Eickemeyer G; Rammelsberg P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 18762033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative SEM studies of the enamel surface appearance following the use of glass ionomer cement and a diacrylate resin for bracket bonding.
    Ostman-Andersson E; Marcusson A; Hörstedt P
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(4):139-46. PubMed ID: 8236031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bonding to previously bleached teeth.
    Homewood C; Tyas M; Woods M
    Aust Orthod J; 2001 Mar; 17(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 11506167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.