BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11458100)

  • 1. Re: Outcome of patients with grossly node positive bladder cancer after pelvic lymph node dissection and radical cystectomy.
    Thompson IM
    J Urol; 2001 Aug; 166(2):630. PubMed ID: 11458100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only.
    Steven K; Poulsen AL
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1218-23; discussion 1223-4. PubMed ID: 17698113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcome of patients with grossly node positive bladder cancer after pelvic lymph node dissection and radical cystectomy.
    Herr HW; Donat SM
    J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):62-4; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 11125364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The association between extent of lymphadenectomy and survival among patients with lymph node metastases undergoing radical cystectomy.
    Wright JL; Lin DW; Porter MP
    Cancer; 2008 Jun; 112(11):2401-8. PubMed ID: 18383515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer: how high is "high enough"?
    Stein JP
    Urol Oncol; 2006; 24(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 16818190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Significance of pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prognosis after radical cystectomy].
    Leissner J; Allhoff EP; Hohenfellner R; Wolf HK
    Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Apr; 127(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 12085284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Superiority of ratio based lymph node staging for bladder cancer.
    Herr HW
    J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):943-5. PubMed ID: 12576818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of 2002 TNM nodal status with lymph node density in node-positive patients after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: analysis by the number of lymph nodes removed.
    Jeong IG; Park J; Song K; Ro JY; Song C; Hong JH; Ahn H; Kim CS
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 19556153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lymph node assessment and lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer.
    Sharir S; Fleshner NE
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Mar; 99(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 19235178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.
    Brunocilla E; Pernetti R; Martorana G
    Anticancer Res; 2011 Jan; 31(1):271-5. PubMed ID: 21273609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of lymphadenectomy in high-grade invasive bladder cancer.
    Stein JP; Skinner DG
    Urol Clin North Am; 2005 May; 32(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 15862616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standardization of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: a collaborative group report.
    Herr H; Lee C; Chang S; Lerner S;
    J Urol; 2004 May; 171(5):1823-8; discussion 1827-8. PubMed ID: 15076285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The prognostic impact of pelvic lymph node metastasis and lymphovascular invasion on bladder cancer.
    Herrmann E; Stöter E; van Ophoven A; Bierer S; Bolenz C; Hertle L; Wülfing C
    Int J Urol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):607-11. PubMed ID: 18462352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal of more lymph nodes may provide better outcome, as well as more accurate pathologic findings, in patients with bladder cancer--analysis of role of pelvic lymph node dissection.
    Honma I; Masumori N; Sato E; Maeda T; Hirobe M; Kitamura H; Takahashi A; Itoh N; Tamakawa M; Tsukamoto T
    Urology; 2006 Sep; 68(3):543-8. PubMed ID: 16979723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Separate submission of standard lymphadenectomy in 6 packets versus en bloc lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer.
    Ather MH; Alam Z; Jamshaid A; Siddiqui KM; Sulaiman MN
    Urol J; 2008; 5(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 18592461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy and its impact on outcome in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer: analysis of data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program data base.
    Konety BR; Joslyn SA; O'Donnell MA
    J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):946-50. PubMed ID: 12576819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evolving role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of bladder cancer.
    Sanderson KM; Stein JP; Skinner DG
    Urol Oncol; 2004; 22(3):205-11; discussion 212-3. PubMed ID: 15271318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer: a review.
    Buscarini M; Josephson DY; Stein JP
    Urol Int; 2007; 79(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 17940349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of separate versus en bloc pelvic lymph node dissection on the number of lymph nodes retrieved in cystectomy specimens.
    Bochner BH; Herr HW; Reuter VE
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2295-6. PubMed ID: 11696756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the minimum number of lymph nodes needed at radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer.
    Capitanio U; Suardi N; Shariat SF; Lotan Y; Palapattu GS; Bastian PJ; Gupta A; Vazina A; Schoenberg M; Lerner SP; Sagalowsky AI; Karakiewicz PI
    BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(10):1359-62. PubMed ID: 19076140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.