These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11458252)

  • 1. A comparative evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of film and digital sensors for detection of simulated periapical lesions.
    Wallace JA; Nair MK; Colaco MF; Kapa SF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jul; 92(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 11458252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film.
    Ozen T; Kamburoğlu K; Cebeci AR; Yüksel SP; Paksoy CS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 18996725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay.
    Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging by using CCD and CMOS-APS sensors with E-speed film in the detection of periapical bony lesions.
    Paurazas SB; Geist JR; Pink FE; Hoen MM; Steiman HR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):356-62. PubMed ID: 10710463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of two digital radiographic storage phosphor systems.
    Oliveira AE; de Almeida SM; Paganini GA; Haiter Neto F; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 11210259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detectability of chemically induced periapical lesions by limited cone beam computed tomography, intra-oral digital and conventional film radiography.
    Sogur E; Baksi BG; Gröndahl HG; Lomcali G; Sen BH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):458-64. PubMed ID: 19767516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of image quality and radiation exposure for dental radiographs produced using a charge-coupled device and a phosphor plate system.
    Farrier SL; Drage NA; Newcombe RG; Hayes SJ; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2009 Oct; 42(10):900-7. PubMed ID: 19548931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variable-resolution cone-beam computerized tomography with enhancement filtration compared with intraoral photostimulable phosphor radiography in detection of transverse root fractures in an in vitro model.
    Wenzel A; Haiter-Neto F; Frydenberg M; Kirkevang LL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Dec; 108(6):939-45. PubMed ID: 19875312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M; Rohlin M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 8884837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of lossy compression on diagnostic accuracy of radiographs for periapical lesions.
    Eraso FE; Analoui M; Watson AB; Rebeschini R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 May; 93(5):621-5. PubMed ID: 12075215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images.
    Cederberg RA; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Shulman JD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 9879219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Efficiency and Image Quality of Photostimulable Phosphor Plate and Charge-Coupled Device Receptors in Dental Radiography.
    Zhang W; Huynh C; Jadhav A; Pinales J; Arvizu L; Tsai J; Flores N
    J Dent Educ; 2019 Oct; 83(10):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 31235501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of film and digital tomograms for assessment of morphological changes in the TMJ.
    Wiese M; Hintze H; Svensson P; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 17329582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries.
    White SC; Yoon DC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 9446988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom.
    Kroft LJ; Geleijns J; Mertens BJ; Veldkamp WJ; Zonderland HM; de Roos A
    Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 14990807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of image enhancements and dual observers on proximal caries detection.
    Gray BM; Mol A; Zandona A; Tyndall D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Apr; 123(4):e133-e139. PubMed ID: 28283097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiovisiography in the detection of periapical lesions.
    Sullivan JE; Di Fiore PM; Koerber A
    J Endod; 2000 Jan; 26(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 11194362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High resolution charge-coupled device sensor vs. medium resolution photostimulable phosphor plate digital receptors for detection of root fractures in vitro.
    Wenzel A; Kirkevang LL
    Dent Traumatol; 2005 Feb; 21(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15660754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "In the eye of the beholder"--how radiographic image interpretation depends on who is looking and when.
    Barbat J
    Aust Endod J; 1998 Aug; 24(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 11431819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of periapical bone defects in human jaws using cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiography.
    Patel S; Dawood A; Mannocci F; Wilson R; Pitt Ford T
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jun; 42(6):507-15. PubMed ID: 19298574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.