BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11458260)

  • 1. Stress levels for well-fitting implant superstructures as a function of tightening force levels, tightening sequence, and different operators.
    Nissan J; Gross M; Shifman A; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 11458260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the stress generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Kim CW; Kim MJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1045-53. PubMed ID: 20162108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of different screw-tightening techniques on the strain generated on an internal-connection implant superstructure. Part 2: Models created with a splinted impression technique.
    Choi JH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 22010085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Operator-induced compressive axial forces during implant gold screw fastening.
    Pesun IJ; Brosky ME; Korioth TW; Hodges J; Devoe BJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 11458259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
    Byrne D; Jacobs S; O'Connell B; Houston F; Claffey N
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Critical bending moment of implant-abutment screw joint interfaces: effect of torque levels and implant diameter.
    Tan BF; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):648-58. PubMed ID: 15508980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.
    Lee J; Kim YS; Kim CW; Han JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 12447217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
    Wise M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
    Goossens IC; Herbst D
    SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Torque generated by handheld screwdrivers and mechanical torquing devices for osseointegrated implants.
    Goheen KL; Vermilyea SG; Vossoughi J; Agar JR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1994; 9(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 8206549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis.
    Watanabe F; Uno I; Hata Y; Neuendorff G; Kirsch A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 10795453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material.
    Assif D; Nissan J; Varsano I; Singer A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of different tightening forces before laser welding to the implant/framework fit.
    da Silveira-Júnior CD; Neves FD; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Prado CJ; Simamoto-Júnior PC
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 19210612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critical bending moment of four implant-abutment interface designs.
    Lee FK; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):744-51. PubMed ID: 20657869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
    Martin WC; Woody RD; Miller BH; Miller AW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11458261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.