These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time. Hecker DM; Eckert SE J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 12690346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Clinical outcome of 802 immediately loaded 2-stage submerged implants with a new grit-blasted and acid-etched surface: 12-month follow-up. Degidi M; Piattelli A; Gehrke P; Carinci F Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):763-8. PubMed ID: 17066638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Measurement of clinicians' ability to hand torque dental implant components. Kanawati A; Richards MW; Becker JJ; Monaco NE J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 19813423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures. Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 17927737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses. Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The influence of tightening sequence and method on screw preload in implant superstructures. Al-Sahan MM; Al Maflehi NS; Akeel RF Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 24392482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study. Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part 1: Stresses generated on the superstructure relative to the size of fit discrepancy. Millington ND; Leung T Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(6):511-6. PubMed ID: 8595110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Bone response to unloaded titanium implants in the fibula, iliac crest, and scapula: an animal study in the Yorkshire pig. Rohner D; Meng CS; Hutmacher DW; Tsai KT Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Aug; 32(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 14505621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques. Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 15248882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evaluation of the ITI Morse taper implant/abutment design with an internal modification. Ding TA; Woody RD; Higginbottom FL; Miller BH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 14696662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The effect of 3 torque delivery systems on gold screw preload at the gold cylinder-abutment screw joint. Tan KB; Nicholls JI Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 11958399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity. Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of the repositioning impression coping technique at the implant level for single-tooth implants. Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Mar; 11(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12705035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. In vivo forces on implants influenced by occlusal scheme and food consistency. Morneburg TR; Pröschel PA Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):481-6. PubMed ID: 14651231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments. Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]