629 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11458267)
1. Comparison of castability and surface roughness of commercially pure titanium and cobalt-chromium denture frameworks.
Jang KS; Youn SJ; Kim YS
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 11458267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surface roughness and internal porosity of partial removable dental prosthesis frameworks fabricated from conventional wax and light-polymerized patterns: a comparative study.
Swelem AA; Abdelnabi MH; Al-Dharrab AA; AbdelMaguid HF
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Apr; 111(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 24360012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Over-refractory casting technique as an alternative to one-piece multi-unit fixed partial denture frameworks.
de Oliveira Correa G; Henriques GE; Mesquita MF; Sobrinho LC
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 16543023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of titanium and cobalt-chromium removable partial denture clasps.
Bridgeman JT; Marker VA; Hummel SK; Benson BW; Pace LL
J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Aug; 78(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 9260137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fabrication of titanium removable dental prosthesis frameworks with a 2-step investment coating method.
Koike M; Hummel SK; Ball JD; Okabe T
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 22633596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The castability of pure titanium compared with Ni-Cr and Ni-Cr-Be alloys.
Paulino SM; Leal MB; Pagnano VO; Bezzon OL
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Dec; 98(6):445-54. PubMed ID: 18061738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of the fit of 3-unit implant-supported frameworks cast in nickel-chromium and cobalt-chromium alloys and commercially pure titanium after casting, laser welding, and simulated porcelain firings.
Tiossi R; Rodrigues RC; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 18546764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of electrobrightening on the fit surface of cobalt-chromium RPD frameworks.
Sinclair GF; Radford DR; Sherriff M; Walter JD
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 11203638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dimensional changes of one-piece frameworks cast from titanium, base metal, or noble metal alloys and supported on telescopic crowns.
Gebelein M; Richter G; Range U; Reitemeier B
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 12616241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of casting technique on surface roughness and consequent mass loss after polishing of NiCr and CoCr base metal alloys: a comparative study with titanium.
Bezzon OL; Pedrazzi H; Zaniquelli O; da Silva TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):274-7. PubMed ID: 15343163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New method for divesting cobalt-chromium alloy castings: sandblasting with a mixed abrasive powder.
Taga Y; Kawai K; Nokubi T
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 11319533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cobalt-chromium-titanium alloy for removable partial dentures.
Iwama CY; Preston JD
Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9484040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of circumferential clasp retention force for titanium and cobalt-chromium removable partial dentures.
Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF; de Mattos Mda G; Bezzon OL
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 12426499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks.
Al-Fadda SA; Zarb GA; Finer Y
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 17455431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques.
Takahashi T; Gunne J
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 12644800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of different finishing and polishing agents on the surface roughness of cast pure titanium.
Reddy ES; Patil NP; Guttal SS; Jagadish HG
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 17451480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Casting titanium partial denture frameworks: a radiographic evaluation.
Cecconi BT; Koeppen RG; Phoenix RD; Cecconi ML
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Mar; 87(3):277-80. PubMed ID: 11941354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surface roughness and fatigue performance of commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy after different polishing protocols.
Guilherme AS; Henriques GE; Zavanelli RA; Mesquita MF
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):378-85. PubMed ID: 15798689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On cobalt-chrome frameworks in implant dentistry.
Hjalmarsson L
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2009; (201):3-83. PubMed ID: 20143574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
