110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1145870)
1. [Mass screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in the country of Frederiksborg. Preliminary evaluation of a centrally controlled system adapted to a selected age group].
Larsen E; Hou-Jensen K
Ugeskr Laeger; 1975 Jul; 137(27):1555-7. PubMed ID: 1145870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [3d mass screening for cervix carcinoma in the testing area].
Lammes FB
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1988 Mar; 132(11):479-80. PubMed ID: 3357553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Mortality from cancer of the uterine cervix in Denmark 1961-71].
Grünfeld K; Horwitz O; Lysgaard-Hansen B
Ugeskr Laeger; 1975 Jan; 137(5):251-9. PubMed ID: 1136032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Status of preventive screening for uterine cervix cancer in Denmark in 1994].
Lynge E; Arffmann E; Erbs K; Hansen KC; Henriksen B; Holten IW; Hølund B; Jakobsen AB; Jespersen NB; Olesen F
Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Jan; 156(4):471-3. PubMed ID: 8140664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Cytological cervical examinations in women developing cancer of the uterine cervix compared with the figures of similar studies in a healthy control group].
Olesen F
Ugeskr Laeger; 1987 Aug; 149(33):2229-32. PubMed ID: 3450039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Mass screening for cancer of the uterine cervix].
Berget A
Ugeskr Laeger; 1975 Jul; 137(27):1558-9. PubMed ID: 1145871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [A comparison between mass screening for uterine neck cancer in the Districts of Frederiksberg and Maribo].
Koch F; Klinken L; Albrechtsen R
Nord Med; 1971 Dec; 86(50):1534. PubMed ID: 5135061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Significance of physical findings in diagnosis of cervical carcinoma.
Moller KA; Fogh H; Moller PE; Strandbygard K
Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun; 19(4):122-7. PubMed ID: 5041568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity and specificity of screening by cervico-vaginal cytology.
Berget A; Olsen J; Poll P
Dan Med Bull; 1977 Feb; 24(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 837739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Present status of mass screening of cancer of the uterine cervix].
Kutsuzawa T; Moriya S; Okubo H; Sakuragi N; Ichinohe K
Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1986 Jul; 61(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 3758914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Carcinoma of the cervix in a country district.
Tennent RB; Tennent MS; Philip NA
N Z Med J; 1967 Mar; 66(415):Suppl:7-13. PubMed ID: 5228790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Mass screening for cervix carcinoma for the time being not extended to young pregnant or non-pregnant women].
van Veen WA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1992 Nov; 136(47):2307-10. PubMed ID: 1461299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Value of the Pap-test in the cervical cytological screening].
Giannone R; Piacezzi C; Poli M; Bernorio R
Minerva Ginecol; 1992 Apr; 44(4):155-9. PubMed ID: 1584446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Systematic screening for cancer of the uterine cervix (epidemiologic aspects)].
Campion J; Flamant R
Bull Inst Natl Sante Rech Med; 1966; 21(5):977-94. PubMed ID: 5976404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. False negative rate in mass screening for cervical cancer.
Sato S; Mikino H; Matsunaga G; Yajima A
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(3):836-7. PubMed ID: 9622728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Characterization of "non-attenders" in an organized screening against cancer of cervix uteri].
Larsen LP; Olesen F
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 May; 158(21):2987-91. PubMed ID: 8686037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Results of the Leiden mass screening for cervix uteri carcinoma; the 'young' (24-34 years) versus the 'old' (35-54 years) group of women].
Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud-Gentenaar JC; Beck S
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Aug; 134(32):1545-9. PubMed ID: 2392176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Geographical differences in cervix cytology screening and the incidence of cervix cancer 1943-1982].
Lynge E
Ugeskr Laeger; 1984 Nov; 146(45):3477-82. PubMed ID: 6515975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Systematic screening for cervix uteri cancer in the hospital].
Chabert P
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1971; 66(11):647-9. PubMed ID: 5148538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Report on a three-county cervical cancer screening project.
Whitlock NH; Long SE; Kuemmerer JM
J S C Med Assoc; 1972 Jun; 68(6):237-46. PubMed ID: 4504050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
