These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11458924)

  • 1. The performance of personal inhalable dust samplers in wood-products industry facilities.
    Tatum VL; Ray AE; Rovell-Rixx DC
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Jul; 16(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 11458924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Field performance of the RespiCon for size-selective sampling of industrial wood processing dust.
    Rando R; Poovey H; Mokadam D; Brisolara J; Glindmeyer H
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 15788383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.
    Görner P; Simon X; Wrobel R; Kauffer E; Witschger O
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 20147627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
    Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Air sampling methodology for asphalt fume in asphalt production and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities: total particulate sampler versus inhalable particulate sampler.
    Calzavara TS; Carter CM; Axten C
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 12746079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Personal sampling for inhalable aerosol exposures of carbon black manufacturing industry workers.
    Kerr SM; Muranko HJ; Vincent JH
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Oct; 17(10):681-92. PubMed ID: 12363209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A field comparison of inhalable and thoracic size selective sampling techniques.
    Davies HW; Teschke K; Demers PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):381-92. PubMed ID: 10518464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of total and inhalable samplers for the collection of wood dust in three wood products industries.
    Harper M; Muller BS
    J Environ Monit; 2002 Oct; 4(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 12400909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance study of personal inhalable aerosol samplers at ultra-low wind speeds.
    Sleeth DK; Vincent JH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):207-20. PubMed ID: 21985868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of personal direct-reading dust monitors for the measurement of airborne inhalable dust.
    Thorpe A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jan; 51(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 16799158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively.
    Thorpe A; Walsh PT
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Nov; 51(8):679-91. PubMed ID: 18024485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Field comparison of two inhalable samplers used in Italy to measure the wood dust exposure.
    Campopiano A; Basili F; Angelosanto F; Cannizzaro A; Olori A; Ramires D; Iannò A; Angelici L
    Int J Occup Environ Health; 2016 Apr; 22(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 27373902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laboratory and field testing of sampling methods for inhalable and respirable dust.
    Linnainmaa M; Laitinen J; Leskinen A; Sippula O; Kalliokoski P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Jan; 5(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 18041642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Field comparison of inhalable and total dust samplers for assessing airborne dust in swine confinement barns.
    Predicala BZ; Maghirang RG
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Sep; 18(9):694-701. PubMed ID: 12909537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Personal sampling in parallel with open-face filter cassettes and IOM samplers for inhalable dust--implications for occupational exposure limits.
    Lidén G; Melin B; Lidblom A; Lindberg K; Norén JO
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Mar; 15(3):263-76. PubMed ID: 10701289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A survey of size-fractionated dust levels in the U.S. wood processing industry.
    Kalliny MI; Brisolara JA; Glindmeyer H; Rando R
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Aug; 5(8):501-10. PubMed ID: 18569517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Site comparison of selected aerosol samplers in the wood industry.
    Kauffer E; Wrobel R; Görner P; Rott C; Grzebyk M; Simon X; Witschger O
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 20044585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wood dust sampling: field evaluation of personal samplers when large particles are present.
    Lee T; Harper M; Slaven JE; Lee K; Rando RJ; Maples EH
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Mar; 55(2):180-91. PubMed ID: 21036895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applications of low-cost, dual-fraction dust samplers.
    Kenny L; Chung K; Dilworth M; Hammond C; Wynn Jones J; Shreeve Z; Winton J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jan; 45(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 11137697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.