175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11460121)
1. Physical sciences lose ground as US shifts towards biology.
Knight J
Nature; 2001 Jul; 412(6844):259. PubMed ID: 11460121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. U.S. research funding. Physical sciences need boost, advisory panel tells Bush.
Malakoff D
Science; 2002 Sep; 297(5587):1622. PubMed ID: 12215613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. U.S. budget 2009. A science budget of choices and chances.
Mervis J
Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5864):714-5. PubMed ID: 18258869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Chemical biology at the US National Science Foundation.
Colón W; Chitnis P; Collins JP; Hicks J; Chan T; Tornow JS
Nat Chem Biol; 2008 Sep; 4(9):511-4. PubMed ID: 18711373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. 2004 science budget. Congress wants the twain to meet.
Couzin J
Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5632):444. PubMed ID: 12881536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. U.S. science policy. What can NIH do for physicists?
Mervis J
Science; 2004 Nov; 306(5701):1463. PubMed ID: 15567829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Nurturing the next Einsteins.
Alexander L
Science; 2005 Feb; 307(5712):1013. PubMed ID: 15718431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Science policy. A budget with big winners and losers.
Kintisch E; Mervis J
Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5762):762-4. PubMed ID: 16469890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Undergraduate science. Biology departments urged to bone up.
Stokstad E
Science; 2002 Sep; 297(5588):1789. PubMed ID: 12228694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. U.S. science funding. A strong defense of science--and a stiff upper lip.
Mervis J
Science; 2011 Mar; 331(6023):1379. PubMed ID: 21415330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Budget numbers for US science looking up.
Hand E; Wadman M
Nature; 2009 Mar; 458(7234):18. PubMed ID: 19262638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Space science. NASA starts squeezing to fit missions into tight budget.
Lawler A
Science; 2005 Dec; 310(5754):1594-5. PubMed ID: 16339413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Future of Federal support for the biological sciences.
Bennett IL
Fed Proc; 1967 Sep; 26(5):1281-3. PubMed ID: 6051307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cutbacks 'will cripple space station science'.
Reichhardt T
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6895):263. PubMed ID: 12124586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The changing norms of the life sciences.
Shorett P; Rabinow P; Billings PR
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Feb; 21(2):123-5. PubMed ID: 12560827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Toward a physical biology.
Rutherford S
Bioessays; 2011 Jun; 33(6):397. PubMed ID: 21590784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Windfall warning.
Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):847-8. PubMed ID: 19829323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Japan's life sciences take integrated road.
Triendl R; Swinbanks D
Nature; 1997 Jul; 388(6639):216. PubMed ID: 9230419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Graduate education. Hughes, NIH team up on novel training program.
Bhattacharjee Y
Science; 2004 Oct; 306(5695):388. PubMed ID: 15486262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [The March for Science – challenges for education in natural sciences and research].
Hebebrand J
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother; 2017 Jul; 45(4):261-263. PubMed ID: 28682213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
