75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11460762)
1. [Preliminary results of short-term follow-up after MIS screw-type implants with rough surface].
Shapira L; Shapira-Nir O
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2001 Jan; 18(1):51-5, 77. PubMed ID: 11460762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite PREVAIL implants: a prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study.
Ostman PO; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 20148916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up.
Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Rangert B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 9(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 17362493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Five-year results of implants with an oxidized surface placed predominantly in soft quality bone and subjected to immediate occlusal loading.
Glauser R; Zembic A; Ruhstaller P; Windisch S
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S59-68. PubMed ID: 17618935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta-analysis.
Srinivasan M; Vazquez L; Rieder P; Moraguez O; Bernard JP; Belser UC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 May; 25(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 23413956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A 5-year prospective multicenter clinical trial of non-submerged dental implants with a titanium plasma-sprayed surface in 200 patients.
Cochran DL; Jackson JM; Jones AA; Jones JD; Kaiser DA; Taylor TD; Weber HP; Higginbottom FL; Richardson JR; Oates T
J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):990-9. PubMed ID: 21235337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Five-year success rate of 831 consecutively placed Zirconia dental implants in humans: a comparison of three different rough surfaces.
Oliva J; Oliva X; Oliva JD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 20369093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative retrospective study of immediately loaded implants in postextraction sites versus healed sites: results after 6 to 7 years in the maxilla.
Malchiodi L; Ghensi P; Cucchi A; Corrocher G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):373-84. PubMed ID: 21483891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mini dental implants: a retrospective analysis of 5640 implants placed over a 12-year period.
Shatkin TE; Petrotto CA
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2012; 33 Spec 3():2-9. PubMed ID: 23029781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immediate loading of tapered implants placed in postextraction sockets: retrospective analysis of the 5-year clinical outcome.
Mura P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):565-74. PubMed ID: 20662861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term evaluation of implant survival in augmented sinuses: a case series.
Yamamichi N; Itose T; Neiva R; Wang HL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Apr; 28(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18546812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant stability measurements for implants placed at the time of extraction: a cohort, prospective clinical trial.
Becker W; Sennerby L; Bedrossian E; Becker BE; Lucchini JP
J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 15857073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrospective clinical evaluation of tapered implants: 10-year follow-up of delayed and immediate placement of maxillary implants.
Ormianer Z; Piek D; Livne S; Lavi D; Zafrir G; Palti A; Harel N
Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 22814562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A retrospective study of the survival of smooth- and rough-surface dental implants.
Balshe AA; Assad DA; Eckert SE; Koka S; Weaver AL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1113-8. PubMed ID: 20162117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: four-year interim report.
Testori T; Wiseman L; Woolfe S; Porter SS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 11324207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immediate function with fixed implant-supported maxillary dentures: a 12-month pilot study.
Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Pera F; Menini M; Ravera G; Drago C; Pera P
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):351-60. PubMed ID: 18456046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A retrospective, multicenter study on a novo wide-body implant for posterior regions.
Vandeweghe S; Ackermann A; Bronner J; Hattingh A; Tschakaloff A; De Bruyn H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):281-92. PubMed ID: 19958373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
