These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11464235)
61. [Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children with psychomotor retardation; less complaints and not as stressful]. Hulsbergen MH; Bosman DK; Mathus-Vliegen EM; Aronson DC; Derkx HH; Taminiau JA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Feb; 144(7):324-7. PubMed ID: 10707744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. [Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): overview and nursing care]. Chiang WJ; Lin YJ; Chang CH; Chen HY Hu Li Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 59(4):94-8. PubMed ID: 22851399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Experience with percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy in a community hospital. Horton WL; Colwell DL; Burlon DT Am J Gastroenterol; 1991 Feb; 86(2):168-70. PubMed ID: 1992629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Complications following insertion and replacement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. Platt MS; Roe DC J Forensic Sci; 2000 Jul; 45(4):833-5. PubMed ID: 10914579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Percutaneous endoscopic gastronomy feeding tubes: a retrospective review at Auckland Hospital 1993-4. Norrie MW; Lane MR N Z Med J; 1996 Aug; 109(1027):299-301. PubMed ID: 8773675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. [Significance of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in home medical care]. Yokota H; Kobayashi H; Yamasaki T; Okumura Y; Kamiyama Y; Shiraishi M; Tsuda Y Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1998 Dec; 25 Suppl 4():521-6. PubMed ID: 9884632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Nutritional status improvement in neurologically impaired patients by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding. Nakao FS; Brant CQ; Stanich P; Ferrari Júnior AP Arq Gastroenterol; 1999; 36(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 10751902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. [Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) for the management of dysphagia: experiences in the neurosurgical care unit]. Wada T; Tanaka M; Miyazaki N; Hasegawa Y; Iwatani Y; Seima Y; Kakinoki K; Tamaki N No Shinkei Geka; 2000 Oct; 28(10):873-7. PubMed ID: 11070907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Enteral tube feeding in the community: survey of adult patients discharged from a Dublin hospital. McNamara EP; Flood P; Kennedy NP Clin Nutr; 2000 Feb; 19(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10700529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Audit of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in long-term enteral feeding in a nursing home. Bourdel-Marchasson I; Dumas F; Pinganaud G; Emeriau JP; Decamps A Int J Qual Health Care; 1997 Aug; 9(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 9304429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies: attitudes of general practitioners and how management may be improved. Heaney A; Tham TC Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Feb; 51(463):128-9. PubMed ID: 11217626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. [Long-term results of enteral nutrition by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in multi-morbid internal medicine patients]. Markgraf R; Geitmann K; Pientka L; Scholten T Z Gastroenterol; 1993 Nov; 31 Suppl 5():21-3. PubMed ID: 8197794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. How are decisions made about the use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for long-term nutritional support? Van Rosendaal GM; Verhoef MJ; Kinsella TD Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Nov; 94(11):3225-8. PubMed ID: 10566719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]