146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11466913)
1. [Low-dose ionising radiation and cancer risk].
Auvinen A; Hakama M; Rytömaa T
Duodecim; 1998; 114(6):505, 507. PubMed ID: 11466913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki builds foundation for risk estimates.
Ketchum LE
J Nucl Med; 1985 Aug; 26(8):833-6. PubMed ID: 3897479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiation safety in children: what we should know.
Tomà P
Radiol Med; 2003; 105(1-2):83-91. PubMed ID: 12700550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Is natural background or radiation from nuclear power plants leukemogenic?
Cronkite EP
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 352():439-48. PubMed ID: 2205872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Long-term oncological consequences of nuclear explosions].
Trapeznikov NN
Vestn Akad Med Nauk SSSR; 1983; (4):30-5. PubMed ID: 6868790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Supra-linear dose-response in the A-bomb study.
Gofman JW
Health Phys; 1989 Dec; 57(6):1037-8. PubMed ID: 2584021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dose-response analyses for the Japanese A-bomb survivors.
Muirhead CR; Butland BK
Health Phys; 1989 Dec; 57(6):1035-6. PubMed ID: 2584020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The RBE of low-LET radiations.
Chadwick KH; Leenhouts HP
J Radiol Prot; 2009 Sep; 29(3):445-47; author reply 447-9. PubMed ID: 19696460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Epidemiology of radiation-induced cancer.
Feinendegen LE; Brooks AL; Morgan WF
Health Phys; 2011 Mar; 100(3):303. PubMed ID: 21285730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Continuation of the discussion concerning neutron effects at Hiroshima.
Rossi HH; Zaider M
Radiat Res; 1997 Feb; 147(2):269-70. PubMed ID: 9008220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cancer and non-cancer effects in Japanese atomic bomb survivors.
Little MP
J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2A):A43-59. PubMed ID: 19454804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. BEIR V report. Experts urge cautious interpretation of higher risk estimates.
Tilyou SM
J Nucl Med; 1990 Apr; 31(4):13A-19A. PubMed ID: 2324815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Supra-linear dose-response for radiation-induced cancer: no basis for Piepho's doubt.
Gofman JW
Health Phys; 1992 Aug; 63(2):236-7. PubMed ID: 1399629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Corrections to the paper "Fitting the Armitage-Doll model to radiation-exposed cohorts and implications for population cancer risks.
Little MP; Hawkins MM; Charles MW; Hildreth NG
Radiat Res; 1994 Jan; 137(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 8265782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Responsibility beyond 60 years.
Bennett BG
Science; 2005 Sep; 309(5741):1649. PubMed ID: 16150979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cancer occurrence among radiation workers at Jaslovské Bohunice nuclear power plant.
Gulis G
Cent Eur J Public Health; 2003 Jun; 11(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 12884554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The cancer epidemiology of radiation.
Wakeford R
Oncogene; 2004 Aug; 23(38):6404-28. PubMed ID: 15322514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nuclear power and cancer in an oil-dependent country.
Lally JF
Del Med J; 2007 May; 79(5):193-4. PubMed ID: 17536576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Review of relative biological effectiveness dependence on linear energy transfer for low-LET radiations.
Hunter N; Muirhead CR
J Radiol Prot; 2009 Mar; 29(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 19225189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The direct estimation of cancer mortality from low-dose ionizing radiation: an international study].
Schweisfurth H
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1995 Apr; 120(17):629. PubMed ID: 7736964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
