These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11467387)

  • 1. Does the sheep mandible relapse following lengthening by distraction osteogenesis?
    McTavish J; Marucci DD; Bonar SF; Walsh WR; Poole MD
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2000 Oct; 28(5):251-7. PubMed ID: 11467387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of latency in mandibular osteodistraction.
    Tavakoli K; Walsh WR; Bonar F; Smart R; Wulf S; Poole MD
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1998 Aug; 26(4):209-19. PubMed ID: 9777499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental study of mechanical analysis in mandibular lengthening. Application of strain gauge measurement.
    Ryoyama D; Sawaki Y; Ueda M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 33(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 15287314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in bone remodelling following distraction osteogenesis of the sheep mandible.
    Marucci DD; Yu Y; McTavish J; Fiona Bonar S; Poole MD; Walsh WR
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2002 Aug; 30(4):208-12. PubMed ID: 12231200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible: histomorphometric evaluation of bone.
    Glowacki J; Shusterman EM; Troulis M; Holmes R; Perrott D; Kaban LB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Feb; 113(2):566-73. PubMed ID: 14758219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primary study of the use of a shape-memory alloy distraction device in the dog mandible for alveolar ridge distraction: determination of osteotomy techniques and evaluation of osteogenesis outcome.
    Xie M; Xiao H; Hu M; Liu H; Li Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 70(12):2876-83. PubMed ID: 22632929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gonial angle changes after bilateral unidirectional mandibular distraction in sheep.
    Helmy M; Lammens J; Struelens A; Verdonck A; Willems G; Schoenaers J; Carels C
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Apr; 25(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 12737210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Five year follow-up of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on the dentofacial structures of syndromic children.
    Gürsoy S; Hukki J; Hurmerinta K
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Feb; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18199081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mandibular lengthening with an implanted motor-driven device: preliminary study in sheep.
    Ploder O; Mayr W; Schnetz G; Unger E; Ewers R; Plenk H
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Aug; 37(4):273-6. PubMed ID: 10475648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of distraction rate on bone histological and histomorphometrical properties in an ovine mandible model.
    Dinu C; Kretschmer W; Băciuţ M; Rotaru H; Bolboacă SD; Gheban D; Muste A; Cătoi C; Peştean C; Băciuţ G
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2011; 52(3):819-25. PubMed ID: 21892524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mandibular lengthening by distraction osteogenesis in children--a one-year follow-up study.
    Huang CS; Ko WC; Lin WY; Liou EJ; Hong KF; Chen YR
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1999 May; 36(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 10342617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. An experimental study on sheep.
    Karaharju-Suvanto T; Peltonen J; Kahri A; Karaharju EO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Apr; 21(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 1602159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical analysis of the effect of mesenchymal stem cells on mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Aykan A; Ozturk S; Sahin I; Gurses S; Ural AU; Oren NC; Isik S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):e169-75. PubMed ID: 23524827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mandibular distraction. An experimental study on sheep.
    Karaharju-Suvanto T; Karaharju EO; Ranta R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1990 Aug; 18(6):280-3. PubMed ID: 2212028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional histomorphometric analysis of distraction osteogenesis using an implanted device for mandibular lengthening in sheep.
    Ploder O; Kanz F; Randl U; Mayr W; Voracek M; Plenk H
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jul; 110(1):130-7; discussion 138. PubMed ID: 12087243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis with newly designed electromechanical distractor.
    Aykan A; Ugurlutan R; Zor F; Ozturk S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1519-23. PubMed ID: 24914755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Addition of mesenchymal stem cells to the scaffold of platelet-rich plasma is beneficial for the reduction of the consolidation period in mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Hwang YJ; Choi JY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1112-24. PubMed ID: 20223574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraoral widening and lengthening of the mandible in baboons by distraction osteogenesis.
    Bell WH; Gonzalez M; Samchukov ML; Guerrero CA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 May; 57(5):548-62; discussion 563. PubMed ID: 10319829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distraction osteogenesis: the effects of orthodontic tooth movement on distracted mandibular bone.
    Liou EJ; Polley JW; Figueroa AA
    J Craniofac Surg; 1998 Nov; 9(6):564-71. PubMed ID: 10029771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Distraction osteogenesis with a fully implantable system. Experimental study].
    Ploder O; Mayr W; Schnetz G; Unger E; Plenk H; Losert U; Ewers R
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1999 May; 3 Suppl 1():S140-3. PubMed ID: 10414101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.