These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

49 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11468645)

  • 1. A comparison of quantitative coronary angiography systems using a unique set of in vivo coronary stenosis images.
    Mancini GB; Yeoh E; Kamimura C; Abbott D
    Can J Cardiol; 2001 Jul; 17(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 11468645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative analysis of early and late angiographic outcomes using two quantitative algorithms in the Balloon versus Optimal Atherectomy Trial (BOAT).
    Lansky AJ; Popma JJ; Cutlip D; Ho KK; Abizaid AS; Saucedo J; Zhang Y; Senerchia C; Kuntz RE; Leon MB; Baim DS
    Am J Cardiol; 1999 Jun; 83(12):1611-6. PubMed ID: 10392863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of different quantitative coronary analysis systems: ARTREK, CAAS, and CMS.
    Hausleiter J; Nolte CW; Jost S; Wiese B; Sturm M; Lichtlen PR
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jan; 37(1):14-22; discussion 23. PubMed ID: 8770474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can the same edge-detection algorithm be applied to on-line and off-line analysis systems? Validation of a new cinefilm-based geometric coronary measurement software.
    Haase J; van der Linden MM; Di Mario C; van der Giessen WJ; Foley DP; Serruys PW
    Am Heart J; 1993 Aug; 126(2):312-21. PubMed ID: 8338000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach.
    Keane D; Haase J; Slager CJ; Montauban van Swijndregt E; Lehmann KG; Ozaki Y; di Mario C; Kirkeeide R; Serruys PW
    Circulation; 1995 Apr; 91(8):2174-83. PubMed ID: 7697846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In-vivo validation of on-line and off-line geometric coronary measurements using insertion of stenosis phantoms in porcine coronary arteries.
    Haase J; Di Mario C; Slager CJ; van der Giessen WJ; den Boer A; de Feyter PJ; Reiber JH; Verdouw PD; Serruys PW
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1992 Sep; 27(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 1525805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative in-vitro validation of eight first- and second-generation quantitative coronary angiography systems.
    Hausleiter J; Jost S; Nolte CW; Dirschinger J; Kastrati A; Stiel GM; Wunderlich W; Fischer F; Linderer T; Hausmann D; Schömig A
    Coron Artery Dis; 1997 Feb; 8(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 9211047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new approach for the quantification of complex lesion morphology: the gradient field transform; basic principles and validation results.
    van der Zwet PM; Reiber JH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Jul; 24(1):216-24. PubMed ID: 8006269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First direct in vivo comparison of two commercially available three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography systems.
    Ramcharitar S; Daeman J; Patterson M; van Guens RJ; Boersma E; Serruys PW; van der Giessen WJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Jan; 71(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18098181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method.
    Mancini GB; Simon SB; McGillem MJ; LeFree MT; Friedman HZ; Vogel RA
    Circulation; 1987 Feb; 75(2):452-60. PubMed ID: 3802448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo validation of a novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system (CardiOp-B): comparison with a conventional two-dimensional system (CAAS II) and with special reference to optical coherence tomography.
    Tsuchida K; van der Giessen WJ; Patterson M; Tanimoto S; García-García HM; Regar E; Ligthart JM; Maugenest AM; Maatrijk G; Wentzel JJ; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2007 May; 3(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 19737692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Edge detection versus densitometry in the quantitative assessment of stenosis phantoms: an in vivo comparison in porcine coronary arteries.
    Di Mario C; Haase J; den Boer A; Reiber JH; Serruys PW
    Am Heart J; 1992 Nov; 124(5):1181-9. PubMed ID: 1442484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of quantitative coronary arteriography using cinefilm and digital images].
    Arai H; Sato H; Aizawa T; Watanabe H
    J Cardiol; 2001 May; 37(5):241-8. PubMed ID: 11392892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo validation of an experimental adaptive quantitative coronary angiography algorithm to circumvent overestimation of small luminal diameters.
    Keane D; Gronenschild E; Slager C; Ozaki Y; Haase J; Serruys PW
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1995 Sep; 36(1):17-24; discussion 25-6. PubMed ID: 7489588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of quantitative coronary angiography in a cineless environment: in vivo assessment of a fully automated system for clinical use.
    Cusma JT; Spero LA; van der Geest RJ; Bashore TM; Morris KG
    Am Heart J; 1995 Feb; 129(2):300-6. PubMed ID: 7832103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A deterministic approach to automated stenosis quantification.
    Tommasini G; Rubartelli P; Piaggio M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Dec; 48(4):435-45. PubMed ID: 10559828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of a new UNIX-based quantitative coronary angiographic system for the measurement of coronary artery lesions.
    Bell MR; Britson PJ; Chu A; Holmes DR; Bresnahan JF; Schwartz RS
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1997 Jan; 40(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 8993818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive approach to accurate analysis of small-diameter vessels in cineangiograms.
    Sonka M; Reddy GK; Winniford MD; Collins SM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Feb; 16(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 9050411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the vasomotility of epicardial coronary arteries with quantitative coronary angiography.
    Jost S; Rafflenbeul W; Lichtlen P
    Z Kardiol; 1989; 78 Suppl 6():143-8. PubMed ID: 2694662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of a new system in quantitative coronary arteriography.
    Svane B; Rasmundson K
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):503-7. PubMed ID: 9240667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.