These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11469262)

  • 1. FreeStyle: a small-volume electrochemical glucose sensor for home blood glucose testing.
    Feldman B; McGarraugh G; Heller A; Bohannon N; Skyler J; DeLeeuw E; Clarke D
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2000; 2(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 11469262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A commercial whole blood glucose biosensor with a low sensitivity to hematocrit based on an impregnated porous carbon electrode.
    Forrow NJ; Bayliff SW
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2005 Oct; 21(4):581-7. PubMed ID: 16202871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Glucocard Memory 2 and Accutrend sensor blood glucose meters.
    Arens S; Moons V; Meuleman P; Struyf F; Zaman Z
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 1998 Jan; 36(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 9594086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Novel micromachined silicon sensor for continuous glucose monitoring.
    Piechotta G; Albers J; Hintsche R
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2005 Nov; 21(5):802-8. PubMed ID: 16242621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of a new test strip for freestyle blood glucose monitoring systems.
    Lock JP; Brazg R; Bernstein RM; Taylor E; Patel M; Ward J; Alva S; Chen T; Welsh Z; Amor W; Bhogal C; Ng R
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 Jan; 13(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21142975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Glucose sensors and the alternate site testing-like phenomenon: relationship between rapid blood glucose changes and glucose sensor signals.
    Koschinsky T; Jungheim K; Heinemann L
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2003; 5(5):829-42. PubMed ID: 14633348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An accurate amperometric glucose sensor based glucometer with eliminated cross-sensitivity.
    Bani Amer MM
    J Med Eng Technol; 2002; 26(5):208-13. PubMed ID: 12487712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alternative site blood glucose testing: a multicenter study.
    Fedele D; Corsi A; Noacco C; Prisco F; Squatrito S; Torre E; Iafusco D; Errico MK; Toniato R; Nicolucci A; Franciosi M; De Berardis G; Neri L
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2003; 5(6):983-9. PubMed ID: 14709201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recording of subcutaneous glucose dynamics by a viscometric affinity sensor.
    Beyer U; Schäfer D; Thomas A; Aulich H; Haueter U; Reihl B; Ehwald R
    Diabetologia; 2001 Apr; 44(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 11357470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Precision and accuracy of two blood glucose meters: FreeStyle Flash versus One Touch Ultra.
    Rivers SM; Kane MP; Bakst G; Busch RS; Hamilton RA
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2006 Aug; 63(15):1411-6. PubMed ID: 16849704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blood glucose meters employing dynamic electrochemistry are stable against hematocrit interference in a laboratory setting.
    Pfützner A; Musholt PB; Schipper C; Demircik F; Hengesbach C; Flacke F; Sieber J; Forst T
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Nov; 7(6):1530-7. PubMed ID: 24351179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) based and glucose oxidase (GOX) based blood glucose meter systems at moderately high altitude.
    Bilen H; Kilicaslan A; Akcay G; Albayrak F
    J Med Eng Technol; 2007; 31(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 17365439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic electrochemistry corrects for hematocrit interference on blood glucose determinations with patient self-measurement devices.
    Musholt PB; Schipper C; Thomé N; Ramljak S; Schmidt M; Forst T; Pfützner A
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 5(5):1167-75. PubMed ID: 22027312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hopes, dreams, and reality: the long road to pain-free glucose testing.
    Taylor SA
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 1999; 1(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 11475278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of hematocrit interference with MyStar extra and seven competitive devices.
    Demircik F; Ramljak S; Hermanns I; Pfützner A; Pfützner A
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 9(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 25549636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Easier and more comfortable measurement of capillary glycemia: the objective of a new electrochemical coulometric device "freestyle papillon mini"].
    Parramón M
    Rev Enferm; 2005 Sep; 28(9):53-6. PubMed ID: 16238010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel planar glucose biosensors for continuous monitoring use.
    Ricci F; Moscone D; Tuta CS; Palleschi G; Amine A; Poscia A; Valgimigli F; Messeri D
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2005 Apr; 20(10):1993-2000. PubMed ID: 15741068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical and clinical evaluation of an electrochemistry glucose meter: experience in a diabetes center.
    Chen HS; Kuo BI; Hwu CM; Shih KC; Kwok CF; Ho LT
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 1998 Oct; 42(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 9884028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of skin temperature and testing site on blood glucose measurements taken by a modern blood glucose monitoring device.
    Haupt A; Berg B; Paschen P; Dreyer M; Häring HU; Smedegaard J; Matthaei S
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Aug; 7(4):597-601. PubMed ID: 16120031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physiological influences on off-finger glucose testing.
    McGarraugh G; Price D; Schwartz S; Weinstein R
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2001; 3(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 11762515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.