219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11469296)
1. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the efficacy of manual and automated instrumentation of root canals.
Schäfer E; Zapke K
J Endod; 2000 Nov; 26(11):660-4. PubMed ID: 11469296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cleaning efficacy using two engine-driven systems versus manual instrumentation in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Alvarez Serrano S; Hernandez SR
J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1279-82. PubMed ID: 21846548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of AET instruments and K-flexofiles.
Drukteinis S; Balciuniene I
Stomatologija; 2006; 8(3):70-5. PubMed ID: 17191061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
Schäfer E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.
Hülsmann M; Rümmelin C; Schäfers F
J Endod; 1997 May; 23(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 9545932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Smear layer production by 3 rotary reamers with different cutting blade designs in straight root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Jeon IS; Spångberg LS; Yoon TC; Kazemi RB; Kum KY
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Nov; 96(5):601-7. PubMed ID: 14600696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
Gergi R; Sabbagh C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cleanliness of the root canal walls after preparation with Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments: a SEM study].
Lichota D; Nowicka A; Woźniak K; Lipski M
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(3):58-62. PubMed ID: 19839513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary.
Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Kahlmeier C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 17511784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
Int Endod J; 2006 Jul; 39(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 16776756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effectiveness of manual and rotary techniques in the cleaning of root canals: a scanning electron microscopy study.
Ahlquist M; Henningsson O; Hultenby K; Ohlin J
Int Endod J; 2001 Oct; 34(7):533-7. PubMed ID: 11601771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
