These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11471267)

  • 1. An in vitro investigation into the use of resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cements as orthodontic bonding agents.
    Choo SC; Ireland AJ; Sherriff M
    Eur J Orthod; 2001 Jun; 23(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 11471267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An ex vivo investigation into the use of a plasma arc lamp when using a visible light-cured composite and a resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement in orthodontic bonding.
    Pettemerides AP; Ireland AJ; Sherriff M
    J Orthod; 2001 Sep; 28(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 11504902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Summers A; Kao E; Gilmore J; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):200-6; quiz 254-5. PubMed ID: 15316475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vivo investigation into the use of resin-modified glass poly(alkenote) cements as orthodontic bonding agents.
    Choo SC; Ireland AJ; Sherriff M
    Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 11544790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bond strength of orthodontic light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Cheng HY; Chen CH; Li CL; Tsai HH; Chou TH; Wang WN
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 20805142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro study of 24-hour and 30-day shear bond strengths of three resin-glass ionomer cements used to bond orthodontic brackets.
    Lippitz SJ; Staley RN; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):620-4. PubMed ID: 9637564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Glass ionomer cements as luting agents for orthodontic brackets.
    Coups-Smith KS; Rossouw PE; Titley KC
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 12940565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Sfondrini MF; Cacciafesta V; Pistorio A; Sfondrini G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11174537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces.
    Lai PY; Woods MG; Tyas MJ
    Aust Orthod J; 1999 Apr; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 11933358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using different light and self-curing cements.
    Toledano M; Osorio R; Osorio E; Romeo A; de la Higuera B; García-Godoy F
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 12607856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
    Lifshitz AB; Cárdenas M
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the debonding strength of orthodontic brackets using three different bonding systems.
    Valletta R; Prisco D; De Santis R; Ambrosio L; Martina R
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 17962317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
    Wilson RM; Donly KJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
    Rix D; Foley TF; Mamandras A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of blood contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a self-etching primer combined with a resin-modified glass ionomer.
    Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Scribante A; De Angelis M; Klersy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):703-8. PubMed ID: 15592219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of using self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Yamada R; Hayakawa T; Kasai K
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):558-64. PubMed ID: 12518948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tensile bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer cement when used for bracket bonding under different conditions: an in vitro study.
    Kirovski I; Madzarova S
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Dec; 22(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 11212607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Changes in the enamel after in vitro debonding of brackets bonded with a modified glass ionomer cement].
    Sorel O; el Alam R; Chagneau F; Cathelineau G
    Orthod Fr; 2000 Apr; 71(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 10916640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.