These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11471787)
21. The forensic psychiatrist as expert witness in malpractice cases. Zonana H J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(4):655-8. PubMed ID: 10638794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Psychiatric expert witnesses: proposals for change. Needell JE Am J Law Med; 1980; 6(3):425-49. PubMed ID: 7468605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses. Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A pilot Rasch scaling of lawyers' perceptions of expert bias. Dattilio FM; Commons ML; Adams KM; Gutheil TG; Sadoff RL J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):482-91. PubMed ID: 17185478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Trading forensic and family commitments. Kearney AJ; Gutheil TG; Commons ML Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(4):533-46. PubMed ID: 9001751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Contingent fees and medical-legal consulting services. Economical or unethical? Dillon MM J Leg Med; 1990 Mar; 11(1):93-114. PubMed ID: 2277233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The role of death qualification and need for cognition in venirepersons' evaluations of expert scientific testimony in capital trials. Butler B; Moran G Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):561-71. PubMed ID: 17440900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. On a therapist serving as a witness. Slovenko R J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 11931356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Attorneys' pressures on the expert witness: early warning signs of endangered honesty, objectivity, and fair compensation. Gutheil TG; Simon RI J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(4):546-53; discussion 554-62. PubMed ID: 10638783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The miasmatic expert witness. Berlin L AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 12818825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Should plaintiffs' experts get contingency fees? Crane M Med Econ; 1997 Oct; 74(20):58-60, 65. PubMed ID: 10174063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. "Just say no": experts' late withdrawal from cases to preserve independence and objectivity. Gutheil TG; Bursztajn H; Hilliard JT; Brodsky A J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 15704624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. American Academy of Psychiatry & the Law ethical guidelines for the practice of forensic psychiatry. American Academy of Psychiatry & Law Newsl Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; ():1-5. PubMed ID: 16944556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Psychiatric expert witnesses in the new millennium. Gutheil TG Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2006 Sep; 29(3):823-32, ix. PubMed ID: 16904514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. "The Fallacy of the Impartial Expert" revisited. Katz J Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 1633335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Do forensic practitioners distinguish between testifying and consulting experts? A pilot study. Gutheil TG; Commons ML; Drogin EY; Hauser MJ; Miller PM; Richardson AM Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(5-6):452-5. PubMed ID: 23040715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Attorneys' requests for complete tax records from opposing expert witnesses: some approaches to the problem. Gutheil TG; Simon RI; Simpson S J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):518-22. PubMed ID: 17185482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]