These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11471788)

  • 1. Post-Daubert admissibility of scientific evidence on malingering of cognitive deficits.
    Vallabhajosula B; van Gorp WG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 11471788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Daubert, cognitive malingering, and test accuracy.
    Mossman D
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Jun; 27(3):229-49. PubMed ID: 12794962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory for Axis II disorders: does it meet the Daubert standard?
    Rogers R; Salekin RT; Sewell KW
    Law Hum Behav; 1999 Aug; 23(4):425-43. PubMed ID: 10439726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of the TOMM in a criminal court forensic assessment setting.
    Delain SL; Stafford KP; Ben-Porath YS
    Assessment; 2003 Dec; 10(4):370-81. PubMed ID: 14682483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should human figure drawings be admitted into court?
    Lally SJ
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Feb; 76(1):135-49. PubMed ID: 11206294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What has a decade of Daubert wrought?
    Berger MA
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S59-65. PubMed ID: 16030340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Admissibility of scientific evidence post-Daubert.
    Masten J; Strzelczyk JJ
    Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 11725886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of the Supreme Court's Daubert criteria in radiation litigation.
    Merwin SE; Moeller DW; Kennedy WE; Moeller MP
    Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):670-7. PubMed ID: 11725885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.
    Davies J
    Med Law; 2005 Jun; 24(2):243-57. PubMed ID: 16082863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury.
    Frederick RI; Bowden SC
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009; 24(2):105-22. PubMed ID: 19333066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: a new standard for scientific evidence in the courts?
    Zonana H
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):309-25. PubMed ID: 7841504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A hybrid decision framework for evaluating psychometric evidence.
    Marlowe DB
    Behav Sci Law; 1995; 13(2):207-28. PubMed ID: 10150377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative EEG and the Frye and Daubert standards of admissibility.
    Thatcher RW; Biver CJ; North DM
    Clin Electroencephalogr; 2003 Apr; 34(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12784902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Kumho, Daubert, and the nature of scientific inquiry: implications for forensic anthropology.
    Grivas CR; Komar DA
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):771-6. PubMed ID: 18489550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standardizing the psychological autopsy: addressing the Daubert standard.
    Snider JE; Hane S; Berman AL
    Suicide Life Threat Behav; 2006 Oct; 36(5):511-8. PubMed ID: 17087630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effort testing in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: validity indicator profile and test of memory malingering performance characteristics.
    Hunt S; Root JC; Bascetta BL
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2014 Mar; 29(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testimony based on the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory: review, commentary, and guidelines.
    Craig RJ
    J Pers Assess; 1999 Oct; 73(2):290-304. PubMed ID: 10624006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Admissibility of neuropsychological testimony after Daubert and Kumho.
    Stern BH
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 11568467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.