These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11471959)

  • 1. Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implants: the world's largest current experience.
    Hedén P; Jernbeck J; Hober M
    Clin Plast Surg; 2001 Jul; 28(3):531-52. PubMed ID: 11471959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The non-perfect results of breast implants].
    Dionyssopoulos A
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2005 Oct; 50(5):534-43. PubMed ID: 16198042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast augmentation with full-height anatomic saline implants: the pros and cons.
    Tebbetts JB
    Clin Plast Surg; 2001 Jul; 28(3):567-77. PubMed ID: 11471962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Round and anatomical mammary implants. Respective advantages and disadvantages].
    Auclair E; Staub S
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2005 Oct; 50(5):505-16. PubMed ID: 16198469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast augmentation with round, smooth saline or gel implants: the pros and cons.
    Elliott LF
    Clin Plast Surg; 2001 Jul; 28(3):523-9. PubMed ID: 11471958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Allergan's silicone gel breast implants.
    Spear SL; Hedén P
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2007 Sep; 4(5):699-708. PubMed ID: 17850205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes over time in mammary compliance values after breast augmentation.
    Mazzocchi M; Alfano C; Fioramonti P; Scuderi N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2006; 30(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 16528621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft cohesive silicone gel breast prostheses: a comparative prospective study of aesthetic results versus lower cohesivity silicone gel prostheses.
    Panettiere P; Marchetti L; Accorsi D
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(5):482-9. PubMed ID: 17399656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Management of tuberous breast deformity with anatomic cohesive silicone gel breast implants.
    Panchapakesan V; Brown MH
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Jan; 33(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 18752021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Serologic and histologic findings in patients with capsular contracture after breast augmentation with smooth silicone gel implants: is serum hyaluronan a potential predictor?
    Prantl L; Pöppl N; Horvat N; Heine N; Eisenmann-Klein M
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2005; 29(6):510-8. PubMed ID: 16328636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast augmentation with anatomic implants: a method based on the breast implantation base.
    Martin del Yerro JL; Vegas MR; Sanz I; Moreno E; Fernandez V; Puga S; Vecino MG; Biggs TM
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2014 Apr; 38(2):329-37. PubMed ID: 24002490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years of experience with the subfascial plane.
    Góes JC; Landecker A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 12925857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediate breast reconstruction with definitive anatomical implants after skin-sparing mastectomy.
    Salgarello M; Farallo E
    Br J Plast Surg; 2005 Mar; 58(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 15710117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions.
    Tepper OM; Small KH; Unger JG; Feldman DL; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp NS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 19387164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of asymmetric implants in breast augmentation surgery].
    Fitoussi AD; Couturaud B
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2005 Oct; 50(5):517-23. PubMed ID: 16198044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast augmentation: Part I--A review of the silicone prosthesis.
    Berry MG; Davies DM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1761-8. PubMed ID: 19713165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
    Spear SL; Pelletiere CV; Menon N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety, complications, and satisfaction of patients undergoing submuscular breast augmentation via the inframammary and endoscopic transaxillary approach.
    Momeni A; Padron NT; Föhn M; Bannasch H; Borges J; Ryu SM; Stark GB
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2005; 29(6):558-64. PubMed ID: 16237580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Silicone gel-filled breast implants approved.
    FDA Consum; 2007; 41(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 17342831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [History of augmentation mammaplasty].
    Glicenstein J
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2005 Oct; 50(5):337-49. PubMed ID: 16185804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.