188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11471999)
1. Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Rashad KM; Bahnassy AA
J Refract Surg; 2001; 17(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 11471999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
J Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 24(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 18500086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of mild to moderate myopic correction by laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis on intraocular pressure measurements with goldmann applanation tonometer, tono-pen, and pneumatonometer.
Vakili R; Choudhri SA; Tauber S; Shields MB
J Glaucoma; 2002 Dec; 11(6):493-6. PubMed ID: 12483093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A correction formula for the real intraocular pressure after LASIK for the correction of myopic astigmatism.
Kohlhaas M; Spoerl E; Boehm AG; Pollack K
J Refract Surg; 2006 Mar; 22(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 16602315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment: a preliminary study in Thai patients.
Ruangvaravate N; Thuangtong A; Kosrirukvongs P; Prabhasawat P; Booranapong W; Srivannaboon S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Mar; 88(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 15962641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Shin J; Kim TW; Park SJ; Yoon M; Lee JW
J Glaucoma; 2015 Mar; 24(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 23807345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment.
Duch S; Serra A; Castanera J; Abos R; Quintana M
J Glaucoma; 2001 Aug; 10(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 11558808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Goldmann and modified Goldmann tonometry measuring intraocular pressure changes in eyes which underwent myopic laser in situ Keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy.
Ang RET; Rixon A; Kilgore K; Schweitzer J
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):503. PubMed ID: 36539706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Change in intraocular pressure in myopic eyes measured with contact and non-contact tonometers after laser in situ keratomileusis.
El Danasoury MA; El Maghraby A; Coorpender SJ
J Refract Surg; 2001; 17(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 11310772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism.
Agudelo LM; Molina CA; Alvarez DL
J Refract Surg; 2002; 18(4):472-4. PubMed ID: 12160160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Kaufmann C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Sep; 44(9):3790-4. PubMed ID: 12939293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pressure phosphene tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for measuring intraocular pressure before and after LASIK.
Shemesh G; Man O; Michaeli A; Varssano D; Lazar M
J Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 23(4):405-9. PubMed ID: 17455836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Applanation tonometry in "normal" patients and patients after LASIK].
Kohlhaas M; Spörl E; Böhm AG; Pollack K; Sandner D; Pillunat LE
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Oct; 222(10):823-6. PubMed ID: 16240277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraocular pressure measurement after hyperopic and myopic LASIK.
Jarade EF; Abi Nader FC; Tabbara KF
J Refract Surg; 2005; 21(4):408-10. PubMed ID: 16128344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pneumotonometry versus Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.
Zadok D; Tran DB; Twa M; Carpenter M; Schanzlin DJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Oct; 25(10):1344-8. PubMed ID: 10511933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A predictive model for postoperative intraocular pressure among patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
Yang CC; Wang IJ; Chang YC; Lin LL; Chen TH
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 141(3):530-536. PubMed ID: 16490501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure relationship in eyes with and without previous LASIK: comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer with pneumatonometer.
Bayraktar S; Bayraktar Z
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2005; 15(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 15751244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry.
Pepose JS; Feigenbaum SK; Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Roberts CJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 17188041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Laser in Situ Keratomileusis on Schiøtz, Goldmann, and Dynamic Contour Tonometric Measurements.
Sales-Sanz M; Arranz-Marquez E; Piñero DP; Arruabarrena C; Mikropoulos DG; Teus MA
J Glaucoma; 2016 Apr; 25(4):e419-23. PubMed ID: 26550981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
