These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11473601)

  • 1. Advances in disinfection testing and modelling.
    Lambert RJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2001 Aug; 91(2):351-63. PubMed ID: 11473601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of interfering substances on the disinfection process: a mathematical model.
    Lambert RJ; Johnston MD
    J Appl Microbiol; 2001 Sep; 91(3):548-55. PubMed ID: 11556923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Susceptibility testing: inoculum size dependency of inhibition using the Colworth MIC technique.
    Lambert RJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2000 Aug; 89(2):275-9. PubMed ID: 10971759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disinfection kinetics: a new hypothesis and model for the tailing of log-survivor/time curves.
    Lambert RJ; Johnston MD
    J Appl Microbiol; 2000 May; 88(5):907-13. PubMed ID: 10792552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. One explanation for the variability of the bacterial suspension test.
    Johnston MD; Simons EA; Lambert RJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2000 Feb; 88(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 10735991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The effect of standardised sodium hypochlorite solution on bacteria pathogenic for the urinary tract (author's transl)].
    Skoluda D; Pfeiffer E; Jurcovic K; Eisen M
    Urologe A; 1976 Jan; 15(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 176759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An investigation into the differences between the Bioscreen and the traditional plate count disinfectant test methods.
    Lambert RJ; van der Ouderaa ML
    J Appl Microbiol; 1999 Apr; 86(4):689-94. PubMed ID: 10212413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of hypochlorite disinfection on meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus rate.
    Mahamat A; Brooker K; Daures JP; Gould IM
    J Hosp Infect; 2011 Jul; 78(3):243-5. PubMed ID: 21507522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disinfection of rigid nasal endoscopes following in vitro contamination with Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Haemophilus influenzae.
    Bradford BD; Seiberling KA; Park FE; Hiebert JC; Chang DF
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jun; 139(6):574-8. PubMed ID: 23680971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of the efficacy of a peroxide system (VIRKON) with special reference to in vitro kinetics of disinfection].
    Gasparini R
    Ann Ig; 1995; 7(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 8663960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Recommendations for the testing and the evaluation of the efficacy of chemical disinfectant procedures (author's transl)].
    Beck EG; Borneff J; Grün L; Gundermann KO; Kanz E; Lammers T; Mülhens K; Primavesi CA; Schmidt B; Schubert R; Weinhold E; Werner HP
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B; 1977 Dec; 165(3-4):335-80. PubMed ID: 414483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Studies on the usefulness of different disinfectants for the aerosol disinfection of surfaces (author's transl)].
    Nicklas W; Böhm KH
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B; 1981; 173(5):365-73. PubMed ID: 6792816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of dilute hypochlorite solutions and an electrochemically activated saline solution containing hypochlorous acid for disinfection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a pig skin model.
    Chang B; Nerandzic MM; Kundrapu S; Sunkesula VC; Deshpande A; Donskey CJ
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 34(11):1231-3. PubMed ID: 24113614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A kinetic study of the effect of hydrogen peroxide and peracetic acid against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa using the bioscreen disinfection method.
    Lambert RJ; Johnston MD; Simons EA
    J Appl Microbiol; 1999 Nov; 87(5):782-6. PubMed ID: 10594721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Model tests for effectiveness assay of disinfectants on surfaces. III. Dependence of test results on the type of substances and the test microbes (Staphylococcus aureus, Mycobacterium terrae)].
    Peters J; Spicher G
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1994 Jan; 195(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 8148019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A collaborative study on the repeatability and the reproducibility of the Dutch standard-suspension-test for the evaluation of disinfectants.
    van Klingeren B; Leussink AB; van Wijngaarden LJ
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B; 1977 Aug; 164(5-6):521-48. PubMed ID: 410202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of three home products in cleaning and disinfection of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli on home environmental surfaces.
    Goodyear N; Brouillette N; Tenaglia K; Gore R; Marshall J
    J Appl Microbiol; 2015 Nov; 119(5):1245-52. PubMed ID: 26274937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of a warming device on contact lens case contamination.
    Willcox MD; Zhu H; Vijay AK
    Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Nov; 38(6):394-9. PubMed ID: 22868901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disinfection model based on excess inactivation sites: implications for linear disinfection curves and the Chick-Watson dilution coefficient.
    Jensen JN
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Nov; 44(21):8162-8. PubMed ID: 20873864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Methods for testing surface disinfection procedures under current conventional conditions].
    Andenmatten R; Reber H
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B; 1984 Aug; 179(4):340-64. PubMed ID: 6395572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.