These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Power of affected sibling method tests for linkage. Tierney C; McKnight B Hum Hered; 1993; 43(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 8406516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of disease genes by use of family data. I. Likelihood-based theory. Whittemore AS; Tu IP Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1328-40. PubMed ID: 10739758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified. Göring HH; Terwilliger JD Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1310-27. PubMed ID: 10731466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data. McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the power of linkage detection by the transmission disequilibrium test and the identity-by-descent test. Clerget-Darpoux F; Babron MC; Bickeböller H Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):583-8. PubMed ID: 8787977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A likelihood ratio test for detecting patterns of disease-marker association. Morris AP; Whittaker JC; Curnow RN Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jul; 61(Pt 4):335-50. PubMed ID: 9365786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genotype relative-risks and association tests for nuclear families with missing parental data. Schaid DJ; Li H Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1113-8. PubMed ID: 9433633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficiency of typing unaffected relatives in an affected-sib-pair linkage study with single-locus and multiple tightly linked markers. Holmans P; Clayton D Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Nov; 57(5):1221-32. PubMed ID: 7485174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tests for genetic association using family data. Shih MC; Whittemore AS Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 22(2):128-45. PubMed ID: 11788959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Affected sib pair identity by state analyses. Thomson G; Motro U Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 7813897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Power calculations for a general class of tests of linkage and association that use nuclear families with affected and unaffected sibs. Kaplan NL; Martin ER Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Nov; 60(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 11855953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of disease genes by use of family data. II. Application to nuclear families. Tu IP; Balise RR; Whittemore AS Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1341-50. PubMed ID: 10739759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Score tests of genetic association in the presence of linkage based on the additive genetic gamma frailty model. Zhong X; Li H Biostatistics; 2004 Apr; 5(2):307-27. PubMed ID: 15054033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association tests using unaffected-sibling versus pseudo-sibling controls. Siegmund KD; Gauderman WJ; Thomas DC Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S731-6. PubMed ID: 10597522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Including non-informative parents in transmission-based association tests. Kulkarni H; Ghosh S J Hum Genet; 2017 Jun; 62(6):621-629. PubMed ID: 28202950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]