These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11474207)

  • 1. Association tests in nuclear families.
    Siegmund KD; Gauderman WJ
    Hum Hered; 2001; 52(2):66-76. PubMed ID: 11474207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linkage detection adaptive to linkage disequilibrium: the disequilibrium maximum-likelihood-binomial test for affected-sibship data.
    Huang J; Jiang Y
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Dec; 65(6):1741-59. PubMed ID: 10577929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing linkage disequilibrium in sibships.
    Siegmund KD; Langholz B; Kraft P; Thomas DC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jul; 67(1):244-8. PubMed ID: 10831398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transmission/disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits.
    Zhu X; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 20(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 11119297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Power of affected sibling method tests for linkage.
    Tierney C; McKnight B
    Hum Hered; 1993; 43(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 8406516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of disease genes by use of family data. I. Likelihood-based theory.
    Whittemore AS; Tu IP
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1328-40. PubMed ID: 10739758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1310-27. PubMed ID: 10731466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
    McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing the power of linkage detection by the transmission disequilibrium test and the identity-by-descent test.
    Clerget-Darpoux F; Babron MC; Bickeböller H
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):583-8. PubMed ID: 8787977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A likelihood ratio test for detecting patterns of disease-marker association.
    Morris AP; Whittaker JC; Curnow RN
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jul; 61(Pt 4):335-50. PubMed ID: 9365786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genotype relative-risks and association tests for nuclear families with missing parental data.
    Schaid DJ; Li H
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1113-8. PubMed ID: 9433633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficiency of typing unaffected relatives in an affected-sib-pair linkage study with single-locus and multiple tightly linked markers.
    Holmans P; Clayton D
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Nov; 57(5):1221-32. PubMed ID: 7485174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tests for genetic association using family data.
    Shih MC; Whittemore AS
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 22(2):128-45. PubMed ID: 11788959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Affected sib pair identity by state analyses.
    Thomson G; Motro U
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 7813897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Power calculations for a general class of tests of linkage and association that use nuclear families with affected and unaffected sibs.
    Kaplan NL; Martin ER
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Nov; 60(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 11855953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic Analysis Workshop II: multiple-locus segregation analysis incorporating linkage markers.
    Risch N
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 14971378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of disease genes by use of family data. II. Application to nuclear families.
    Tu IP; Balise RR; Whittemore AS
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1341-50. PubMed ID: 10739759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Score tests of genetic association in the presence of linkage based on the additive genetic gamma frailty model.
    Zhong X; Li H
    Biostatistics; 2004 Apr; 5(2):307-27. PubMed ID: 15054033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association tests using unaffected-sibling versus pseudo-sibling controls.
    Siegmund KD; Gauderman WJ; Thomas DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S731-6. PubMed ID: 10597522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Including non-informative parents in transmission-based association tests.
    Kulkarni H; Ghosh S
    J Hum Genet; 2017 Jun; 62(6):621-629. PubMed ID: 28202950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.