483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11474352)
1. Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervical fixation.
Mihara H; Cheng BC; David SM; Ohnari K; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Aug; 26(15):1662-7. PubMed ID: 11474352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro biomechanical comparison of multistrand cables with conventional cervical stabilization.
Weis JC; Cunningham BW; Kanayama M; Parker L; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Sep; 21(18):2108-14. PubMed ID: 8893435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of cervical spinal stabilization methods in a human cadaveric model.
Coe JD; Warden KE; Sutterlin CE; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1989 Oct; 14(10):1122-31. PubMed ID: 2588063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical testing of posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques.
Melcher RP; Puttlitz CM; Kleinstueck FS; Lotz JC; Harms J; Bradford DS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(22):2435-40. PubMed ID: 12435971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of a newly developed monocortical expansion screw for use in anterior internal fixation of the cervical spine. In vitro comparison with two established internal fixation systems.
Richter M; Wilke HJ; Kluger P; Claes L; Puhl W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 10025014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment.
Mihara H; Onari K; Cheng BC; David SM; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 12567023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of transfacet screws to lateral mass screw-rod constructs in the lower cervical spine.
Tong J; Ji W; Zhou R; Huang Z; Liu S; Zhu Q
Eur Spine J; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1787-93. PubMed ID: 26530298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy: a biomechanical study.
Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(8):845-9. PubMed ID: 15082982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical analysis of Goel technique for C1-2 fusion.
Park J; Scheer JK; Lim TJ; Deviren V; Ames CP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 21332283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anterior occiput to axis screw fixation: part II: a biomechanical comparison with posterior fixation techniques.
Dvorak MF; Sekeramayi F; Zhu Q; Hoekema J; Fisher C; Boyd M; Goertzen DJ; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 12567024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical analysis of cervical stabilization systems. An assessment of transpedicular screw fixation in the cervical spine.
Kotani Y; Cunningham BW; Abumi K; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Nov; 19(22):2529-39. PubMed ID: 7855677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of the stable efficacy of two anterior plating systems.
Yang S; Wang LW
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Jul; 18(6):S59-66. PubMed ID: 12828916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation.
Setzer M; Eleraky M; Johnson WM; Aghayev K; Tran ND; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical analysis of rigid stabilization techniques for three-column injury in the lower cervical spine.
Bozkus H; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Nottmeier EW; Sonntag VK; Papadopoulos SM; Crawford NR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(8):915-22. PubMed ID: 15834336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
