These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11474939)

  • 1. The measurement of kappach factors for application with the IPEMB very low energy dosimetry protocol.
    Perrin BA; Whitehurst P; Cooper P; Hounsell AR
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Jul; 46(7):1985-95. PubMed ID: 11474939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Air kerma calibration factors and chamber correction values for PTW soft x-ray, NACP and Roos ionization chambers at very low x-ray energies.
    Ipe NE; Rosser KE; Moretti CJ; Manning JW; Palmer MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Aug; 46(8):2107-17. PubMed ID: 11512614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry.
    Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; García-Martínez T; Niatsetski Y; Nauta G; Schuurman J; Ouhib Z; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4954-64. PubMed ID: 26233221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of ionization chambers for the relative dosimetry of kilovoltage x-ray beams.
    Hill R; Mo Z; Haque M; Baldock C
    Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3971-81. PubMed ID: 19810470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Addendum to the IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al-4 mm Cu HVL).
    Aukett RJ; Burns JE; Greener AG; Harrison RM; Moretti C; Nahum AE; Rosser KE;
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(12):2739-48. PubMed ID: 15930599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microionization chamber air-kerma calibration coefficients as a function of photon energy for x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co.
    Snow JR; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041711. PubMed ID: 23556881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ionization chamber dosimetry based on
    Araki F; Ohno T; Umeno S
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(18):185018. PubMed ID: 30101751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A study of polarity effect for various ionization chambers in kilovoltage x-ray beams.
    Yousif YAM; Daniel J; Healy B; Hill R
    Med Phys; 2024 Jun; 51(6):4513-4523. PubMed ID: 38669346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.
    Drzymala RE; Alvarez PE; Bednarz G; Bourland JD; DeWerd LA; Ma L; Meltsner SG; Neyman G; Novotny J; Petti PL; Rivard MJ; Shiu AS; Goetsch SJ
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6745-56. PubMed ID: 26520764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study on the suitability of the PTW microDiamond detector for kilovoltage x-ray beam dosimetry.
    Damodar J; Odgers D; Pope D; Hill R
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2018 May; 135():104-109. PubMed ID: 29413822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of the chamber correction factor (k(ch)) for the UK secondary standard ionization chamber (NE2561/NE2611) using medium-energy x-rays.
    Rosser KE
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Nov; 43(11):3195-206. PubMed ID: 9832011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of the influence of phantom material and size on the calibration of ionization chambers in terms of absorbed dose to water.
    Arib M; Medjadj T; Boudouma Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 7(3):55-64. PubMed ID: 17533342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The calibration of parallel-plate electron ionization chambers at NPL for use with the IPEM 2003 code of practice: summary data.
    Bass G; Thomas R; Pearce J
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(8):N115-24. PubMed ID: 19305037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Verification of absorbed doses determined with thimble and parallel-plate ionization chambers in clinical electron beams using ferrous sulphate dosimetry.
    Van der Plaetsen A; Seuntjens J; Thierens H; Vynckier S
    Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 8164587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dosimetry measurements with an intra-operative x-ray device.
    Eaton DJ; Duck S
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(12):N359-69. PubMed ID: 20505225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a micro ionization chamber for dosimetric measurements in image-guided preclinical irradiation platforms.
    Silvestre Patallo I; Carter R; Maughan D; Nisbet A; Schettino G; Subiel A
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Dec; 66(24):. PubMed ID: 34794132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An experimental evaluation of recent electron dosimetry codes of practice.
    Nisbet A; Thwaites DI; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Aug; 43(8):1999-2014. PubMed ID: 9725585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.